C++ pair<int,int> 对作为 unordered_map 问题的键

声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow 原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4870437/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me): StackOverFlow

提示:将鼠标放在中文语句上可以显示对应的英文。显示中英文
时间:2020-08-28 16:48:53  来源:igfitidea点击:

pair<int,int> pair as key of unordered_map issue

c++unordered-mapstd-pair

提问by icn

My code:

我的代码:

 typedef pair<int,int> Pair
  tr1::unordered_map<Pair,bool> h;
  h.insert(make_pair(Pair(0,0),true));

Erorr

错误

 undefined reference to `std::tr1::hash<std::pair<int, int> >::operator()(std::pair<int, int>) const'

Something I need to fix?

我需要修复什么?

thanks

谢谢

回答by Murilo Vasconcelos

This happens because there is no specialization for std::tr1::hash<Key>with Key = std::pair<int, int>. You must to specialize std::tr1::hash<Key>with Key = std::pair<int, int>before declaring tr1::unordered_map<Pair,bool> h;. This happens because stddon't know how to hash a pair<int, int>.

发生这种情况是因为没有专门化std::tr1::hash<Key>with Key = std::pair<int, int>。你必须专注std::tr1::hash<Key>Key = std::pair<int, int>申报前tr1::unordered_map<Pair,bool> h;。发生这种情况是因为std不知道如何散列 a pair<int, int>

Following there is a example of how to specialize std::tr1::hash<>

下面是一个如何专业化的例子 std::tr1::hash<>

template <>
struct std::tr1::hash<std::pair<int, int> > {
public:
        size_t operator()(std::pair<int, int> x) const throw() {
             size_t h = SOMETHING;//something with x   
             return h;
        }
};

回答by fight_club

Unordered Map does not contain a hash function for a pair, So if we want to hash a pair then we have to explicitly provide it with a hash function that can hash a pair.

Unordered Map 不包含一个对的哈希函数,所以如果我们想对一个对进行哈希,那么我们必须明确地为它提供一个可以对一对进行哈希的哈希函数。

If we want to use pair as a key to unordered_map, there are 2 ways to do it :

如果我们想使用pair作为unordered_map的键,有两种方法:

  1. Define specializaion for std::hash
  1. 为 std::hash 定义特化
typedef std::pair<std::string,std::string> pair;

struct pair_hash
{
    template <class T1, class T2>
    std::size_t operator() (const std::pair<T1, T2> &pair) const
    {
        return std::hash<T1>()(pair.first) ^ std::hash<T2>()(pair.second);
    }
};

int main()
{
    std::unordered_map<pair,int,pair_hash> unordered_map =
    {
        {{"C++", "C++11"}, 2011},
        {{"C++", "C++14"}, 2014},
        {{"C++", "C++17"}, 2017},
        {{"Java", "Java 7"}, 2011},
        {{"Java", "Java 8"}, 2014},
        {{"Java", "Java 9"}, 2017}
    };

    for (auto const &entry: unordered_map)
    {
        auto key_pair = entry.first;
        std::cout << "{" << key_pair.first << "," << key_pair.second << "}, "
                  << entry.second << '\n';
    }

    return 0;
}
  1. Using Boost Library Another good way is to use boost::hash from Boost.functional which can be used to hash integers,floats,pointers,strings,arrays,pairs and theh STL containers.
  1. 使用 Boost 库 另一种好方法是使用 Boost.functional 中的 boost::hash,它可用于散列整数、浮点数、指针、字符串、数组、对和 STL 容器。
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/functional/hash.hpp>
#include <unordered_map>
#include <utility>

typedef std::pair<std::string,std::string> pair;

int main()
{
    std::unordered_map<pair,int,boost::hash<pair>> unordered_map =
    {
        {{"C++", "C++11"}, 2011},
        {{"C++", "C++14"}, 2014},
        {{"C++", "C++17"}, 2017},
        {{"Java", "Java 7"}, 2011},
        {{"Java", "Java 8"}, 2014},
        {{"Java", "Java 9"}, 2017}
    };

    for (auto const &entry: unordered_map)
    {
        auto key_pair = entry.first;
        std::cout << "{" << key_pair.first << "," << key_pair.second << "}, "
                  << entry.second << '\n';
    }

    return 0;
}

回答by Manohar Reddy Poreddy

Ran into the same issue:

遇到同样的问题:

unordered_map <pair<x, y>, z> m1;

A few workarounds are:

一些解决方法是:

unordered_map <stringxy, z> m1;
// the first and second of the pair merged to a string
//   though string parsing may be required, looks same complexity overall

unordered_multimap <x, pair<y, z>> m1;
// second of the pair of the key went into value.  
//   time complexity slightly increases

deque<deque<x>> d1;
// here x & y are of same type, z is stored as: d1[x][y] = z
//   space required is x * y, however time complexity is O(1)