git 协作者是否拥有 GitHub 上的提交访问权限？
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5010754/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Do collaborators have commit access on GitHub?
提问by Brettski
One thing I noticed: Using the GitHub UI, I added a collaborator to a repository. I saw that they committed changes without any authority / approval from me. It was a private repository.
我注意到的一件事：使用 GitHub UI，我向存储库添加了一个协作者。我看到他们在没有我的任何授权/批准的情况下进行了更改。这是一个私人存储库。
With private repositories, how do I give someone read access versus write access?
使用私有存储库，我如何授予某人读访问权与写访问权？
回答by Simone Carletti
With private repositories, how do I give someone read access versus write access?
使用私有存储库，我如何授予某人读访问权与写访问权？
This kind of permission is not available for simple accounts. When you add an user as a collaborator, he gains read/write permissions.
此类权限不适用于简单帐户。当您将用户添加为协作者时，他将获得读/写权限。
The story changes if you own an Organization. Organizations contains teams and each team can have different level of access, including read-only. You can assign users to a specific read-only group, and they will only have pull access to the repositories.
如果您拥有一个组织，情况就会改变。组织包含团队，每个团队可以拥有不同级别的访问权限，包括只读。您可以将用户分配到特定的只读组，并且他们只能对存储库进行拉取访问。
回答by mipadi
Private repositories in an ordinary user account are an all-or-nothing deal: either someone has full read/write access (i.e., they're a collaborator) or they have no access. However, if you set up an organization, create the repo under the aegis of the organization, and then add the collaborator, you have much more fine-grained control (including giving read-only access to a private repo).
普通用户帐户中的私有存储库是一个要么全有要么全无的交易：要么某人拥有完全的读/写访问权限（即，他们是合作者），要么他们没有访问权限。但是，如果您建立一个组织，在该组织的支持下创建存储库，然后添加协作者，您将拥有更细粒度的控制（包括授予对私有存储库的只读访问权限）。
