database 免费的便携式数据库
声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/557632/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Free portable database
提问by Cicik
Hi I am developing desktop portable free application and I`m looking for portable database:
嗨,我正在开发桌面便携式免费应用程序,我正在寻找便携式数据库:
- free
- without install
- up to 20K records
- standalone application
- supports encryption (optional)
- SQL92 spec
- 自由
- 无需安装
- 多达 20K 条记录
- 独立应用
- 支持加密(可选)
- SQL92 规范
thanks for advice
谢谢你的建议
can you write some advantages and disadvangtages?
能不能写出一些优点和缺点?
回答by Adam Davis
回答by zendar
About:
关于:
Firebird is an open source relational database offering many ANSI SQL-99 features that runs on Linux, Windows, and a variety of Unix platforms. Firebird offers excellent concurrency, high performance, powerful language support for stored procedures and triggers.
Firebird 是一个开源关系数据库,提供许多 ANSI SQL-99 功能,可在 Linux、Windows 和各种 Unix 平台上运行。Firebird 为存储过程和触发器提供了出色的并发性、高性能、强大的语言支持。
回答by slim
回答by zendar
Depending on your problem, you may consider Ms Access.
根据您的问题,您可以考虑 Ms Access。
You can connect to Access database through Jet engine which is installed on Windows XP and newer.
您可以通过安装在 Windows XP 和更新版本上的 Jet 引擎连接到 Access 数据库。
Since v2002 it is SQL 92 compliant (as Microsoft claims).
从 v2002 开始,它符合 SQL 92(正如 Microsoft声称的那样)。
回答by PhiLho
Tokyo Cabinetwould be a good candidate, except it isn't relational (so no SQL).
Given you don't have so many records, maybe a full relational database is overkill for your needs. Or not, it depends on your application, of course.
东京内阁将是一个很好的候选人,除了它不是关系(所以没有 SQL)。
鉴于您没有这么多记录,也许一个完整的关系数据库对于您的需求来说太过分了。与否,当然,这取决于您的应用程序。
回答by Rockcoder
回答by Nick Van Brunt
Not sure it meets the no install requirement but if you need more than SQLite check Apache Derby.
不确定它是否满足无安装要求,但如果您需要的不仅仅是 SQLite,请检查Apache Derby。
回答by Allen Rice
Edit: Ooops, apparently I meant SQL Compact, not express
编辑:哎呀,显然我的意思是SQL Compact,而不是express