Java Aptana Studio 与 Eclipse
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1607226/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Aptana Studio vs. Eclipse
提问by RKh
I am a beginner. I am using Aptana Studio for PHP. Today, I also downloaded Eclipse. I notice most of the features and workings are similar. It seems one is built on the code-base of the other.
我是初学者。我正在使用 Aptana Studio for PHP。今天，我也下载了Eclipse。我注意到大多数功能和工作方式都相似。似乎一个是建立在另一个的代码库上的。
If so, what was the need for two similar Open Source IDEs on Java?
如果是这样，那么在 Java 上需要两个类似的开源 IDE 吗？
采纳答案by Peter Boughton
Aptana is built on Eclipse.
Aptana 建立在 Eclipse 之上。
Eclipse is a general-purpose/Java-focused editor, whilst Aptana offers additional features which are targeted specifically at web development.
Eclipse 是一个通用/专注于 Java 的编辑器，而 Aptana 提供了专门针对 Web 开发的附加功能。
There are also other Eclipse plugins that also focus on web development, including the Web Tools Project from the Eclipse team.
还有其他 Eclipse 插件也专注于 Web 开发，包括来自 Eclipse 团队的 Web Tools Project。
Some people like Aptana, finding it a convenient mix of relevant tools. Others find Aptana too intrusive, and prefer to individually select their own plugins for JavaScript, CSS, XML, and so on.
有些人喜欢 Aptana，发现它是相关工具的便捷组合。其他人则认为 Aptana 太具有干扰性，并且更喜欢为 JavaScript、CSS、XML 等单独选择自己的插件。
what was the need for two similar Open Source IDEs on Java.
对 Java 上两个类似的开源 IDE 的需求是什么？
Variety is the spice of life. There are plenty of other IDEs aside from just these two, and the same situation applies to most software, and tools/technologies in general.
变化是生活的调味品。除了这两个之外，还有很多其他的 IDE，同样的情况适用于大多数软件，以及一般的工具/技术。
Generally, different tools don't have the same focuses, and therefore provide varying benefits for different users.
通常，不同的工具没有相同的侧重点，因此为不同的用户提供不同的好处。
This is especiallytrue in the Open Source world, where users can easily customise and re-release products to work in the way they want.
这是特别是在开源的世界里，用户可以轻松地在他们希望的方式定制和重新发布产品工作真。
回答by Ben James
You might wonder why the developers of Aptana built a "new" IDE based on Eclipse rather than simply working on Eclipse plugins.
您可能想知道为什么 Aptana 的开发人员基于 Eclipse 构建了一个“新的”IDE，而不是简单地处理 Eclipse 插件。
The reason for this is that there used to be a paid-for Pro version of Aptana. This no longer exists however; you can get all the Aptana features now in the free Community Edition.
这样做的原因是曾经有一个付费的 Aptana 专业版。然而，这不再存在；您现在可以在免费的 Community Edition 中获得所有 Aptana 功能。
回答by Erkan BALABAN
If you are searching for an free / open source IDE for PHP development i suggest Eclipse. If you can give some money to some company i suggest you give a try PHP Designer. PHP Designer supports as you guess PHP and debugging, also javascript framework like jQuery.
如果您正在寻找用于 PHP 开发的免费/开源 IDE，我建议您使用 Eclipse。如果你能给一些公司一些钱，我建议你试试 PHP Designer。PHP Designer 支持您猜测的 PHP 和调试，还支持 jQuery 等 javascript 框架。
回答by Neil
I have been using Aptana Studio 3 myself and I have to say that I like it so far. Which is odd because after using the IDEs I have used in the past I always ended up back with a text editor to write my code in.
我自己一直在使用 Aptana Studio 3，我不得不说到目前为止我很喜欢它。这很奇怪，因为在使用我过去使用过的 IDE 之后，我总是回到文本编辑器来编写我的代码。
I was curious about Eclipse as well and that is why I ended up at your question. I watched the Eclipse demoat the Eclipse site and I think I'll be sticking with Aptana. Just because it does appear to look and function very similar and I have decided that I do like Aptana. I was just searching to see if that was a certain feature or improvement Eclipse could offer.
我也对 Eclipse 很好奇，这就是为什么我最终回答了你的问题。我在 Eclipse 站点上观看了Eclipse 演示，我想我会坚持使用 Aptana。仅仅因为它看起来和功能非常相似，我决定我确实喜欢 Aptana。我只是想看看这是否是 Eclipse 可以提供的某个功能或改进。
