.net 工具比较：Visual Assist X 和 Resharper
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/148678/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Tool Comparison: Visual Assist X and Resharper
提问by Graviton
.NET developers out there! Need your opinion here!
.NET 开发人员在那里！这里需要你的意见！
I am now using Visual Assist X, a decent piece of software, indeed. But the .NET bloggers seem to prefer Resharpermore. I might want to consider a switch over, but before that I want your guys opinion first.
我现在正在使用Visual Assist X，确实是一款不错的软件。但 .NET 博主似乎更喜欢Resharper。我可能想考虑转换，但在此之前，我先征求你们的意见。
回答by Rasmus Faber
Resharper is much better for C# code (and supposedly VB.Net, but I haven't tried that). Unfortunately there is no support for C/C++, so if you need that, you might want to keep Visual Assist around.
Resharper 对于 C# 代码（据说是 VB.Net，但我没有尝试过）要好得多。不幸的是，不支持 C/C++，因此如果您需要它，您可能希望保留 Visual Assist。
They don't coexist very well, unfortunately, so you may need to unload one, then load the other, when switching between C/C++ and C#.
不幸的是，它们不能很好地共存，因此在 C/C++ 和 C# 之间切换时，您可能需要先卸载一个，然后再加载另一个。
To see the magic of Resharper, I would recommend watching the "Resharper Jedi" video.
要了解 Resharper 的魔力，我建议您观看“Resharper Jedi”视频。
回答by Dima Stefantsov
C/C++ = Visual Assist X.
C/C++ = 视觉辅助 X。
For me, C# = ReSharper + Visual Assist X.
对我来说，C# = ReSharper + Visual Assist X。
Needless to say, ReSharper is much more powerful for C# development, than VA. But there are some features, like ability to show just methods in suggestions list, or highlight nearest scope that are in VA, but no equivalent in R#. I use both. Looks like they live pretty well together: i use default settings for VA, and i had to select ReSharper-->Options-->IntelliSense-->General-->Visual Studio to enable VA version of IntelliSense instead of ReSharper's one. I also customized identifiers colors in ReSharper, now they look like VA default colors, but show additional information (like Mutable Local Variables are bold).
毋庸置疑，ReSharper 在 C# 开发方面比 VA 强大得多。但是有一些功能，例如能够在建议列表中仅显示方法，或突出显示 VA 中最近的范围，但在 R# 中没有等价物。我两个都用。看起来他们相处得很好：我使用 VA 的默认设置，我不得不选择 ReSharper-->Options-->IntelliSense-->General-->Visual Studio 以启用 VA 版本的 IntelliSense 而不是 ReSharper 的版本。我还在 ReSharper 中自定义了标识符颜色，现在它们看起来像 VA 默认颜色，但显示附加信息（如可变局部变量是粗体）。
回答by Hans L?ken
I know you only asked for a comparison of Resharper vs. Visual Assist but if you are doing .NET development you may also want to consider "Refactor! Pro".
我知道您只要求比较 Resharper 与 Visual Assist，但如果您正在进行 .NET 开发，您可能还需要考虑"Refactor! Pro"。
I remember using VA years ago when doing Visual C++ development (and earlier than that the infamous CodeWiz) but with .NET development I get the impression that the majority of developers seem to use either ReSharper or Refactor!.
我记得几年前在进行 Visual C++ 开发时使用 VA（比臭名昭著的 CodeWiz 更早），但在 .NET 开发中，我的印象是大多数开发人员似乎使用 ReSharper 或 Refactor！。
Refactor! also integrates with a code-generation tool called "CodeRush" and I've seen them both used very effectively together with Testdriven.Net (check out the Summer of NHibernatescreencasts).
重构！还集成了一个名为“CodeRush”的代码生成工具，我已经看到它们与 Testdriven.Net 一起非常有效地使用（查看夏天的 NHibernate截屏视频）。
Personally I use Resharper and I am very pleased with how much it has increased my productivity but I'm sure you'll get equal benefit with Refactor!.
我个人使用 Resharper，我对它提高了我的工作效率感到非常满意，但我相信你会通过 Refactor! 获得同样的好处。
