我应该使用哪个 Eclipse Subversion 插件？
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/185486/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Which Eclipse Subversion plugin should I use?
提问by Dean Rather
Subclipse, Subversive, or something else?
There's a bit of debatearound the topic, can we come to some conclusion here?
EDIT:It's been a couple months now, and I ended up deciding the plugin slowed Eclipse down too much, and was a hassle to use every time I changed a file from outside Eclipse. I ditched the plugin all together and just went with TortiseSVN.
编辑：现在已经几个月了，我最终决定该插件使 Eclipse 的速度减慢太多，并且每次我从 Eclipse 外部更改文件时使用起来都很麻烦。我完全放弃了插件，只使用了 TortiseSVN。
采纳答案by Julie
This depends. Subclipsehas superior support for checking out projects as maven projects - this is the sole reason we use Subclipse. Other than that, I have noticed subclipse bugs with syncing with SVN.
这取决于。 Subclipse对将项目作为 maven 项目检出有卓越的支持——这是我们使用 Subclipse 的唯一原因。除此之外，我还注意到与 SVN 同步的 subclipse 错误。
Subversiveis much better at detecting new files to add to version control, and is also far superior with merging code from a branch, or even syncing with SVN (fewer bugs, etc.). So really, you should ask yourself what value you want. If you're not using maven, I would definitely go for Subversive.
Subversive在检测新文件以添加到版本控制方面要好得多，并且在合并来自分支的代码，甚至与 SVN 同步（更少的错误等）方面也更出色。所以真的，你应该问问自己你想要什么价值。如果您不使用 maven，我肯定会选择 Subversive。
回答by Eric Tuttleman
I've recently switched from subclipse to subversive. After upgrading our repository from v1.4.x to 1.5, we started having lots of issues with subclipse.
我最近从 subclipse 切换到 subversive。在将我们的存储库从 v1.4.x 升级到 1.5 之后，我们开始遇到很多 subclipse 问题。
After doing a synch, you'd see updates that you had just accepted, and you wouldn't be able to take other updates without doing "hacks"
进行同步后，您会看到刚刚接受的更新，如果不进行“黑客攻击”，您将无法进行其他更新
So far subversive is pretty nice. it even seems a little faster for lots of small files than subclipse was.
到目前为止颠覆性是相当不错的。对于许多小文件来说，它甚至看起来比 subclipse 快一点。
回答by abarax
Personally i use subversive. It has better usability features, mainly intuitive keyboard shortcuts etc.
我个人使用颠覆性的。它具有更好的可用性功能，主要是直观的键盘快捷键等。
I have never had a problem using either though. It really is just a combination of personal preference and usage though, if you're using advanced complex features it might matter which one you choose, but if your just checking in, checking out and synchronizing they will both meet your needs.
不过，我从来没有遇到过使用问题。不过，这实际上只是个人喜好和使用情况的结合，如果您使用高级复杂功能，选择哪一个可能很重要，但如果您只是签入、签出和同步，它们都将满足您的需求。
回答by dragonmantank
I'm casting my vote for Subclipse. I've had better luck with it than Subversivepersonally.
我正在为Subclipse投票。我个人的运气比Subversive 好。
回答by Mark
subclipse is fully packed with features, I have never had an issue with it.
subclipse 功能齐全，我从来没有遇到过它的问题。
