我是否正确实现了基于泛型的 Java 工厂?

声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow 原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6191710/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me): StackOverFlow

提示:将鼠标放在中文语句上可以显示对应的英文。显示中英文
时间:2020-10-30 14:46:01  来源:igfitidea点击:

Am I implementing a generics-based Java factory correctly?

javagenericsfactory-pattern

提问by Andrew

I don't believe I am implementing the factory pattern correctly because the Applicationclass' createDocumentmethod accepts any class type, not just subclasses of Document.

我不相信我正确地实现了工厂模式,因为Application类的createDocument方法接受任何类类型,而不仅仅是Document.

In other words, is there a way I can restrict the createDocumentmethod to only accept subclasses of Document?

换句话说,有没有办法限制createDocument方法只接受 的子类Document

  • Document.java

    package com.example.factory;
    
    public abstract class Document {
        public Document() {
            System.out.println("New Document instance created: " + this.toString());
        }
    }
    
  • DrawingDocument.java

    package com.example.factory
    
    public class DrawingDocument extends Document {
        public DrawingDocument() {
            System.out.println("New DrawingDocument instance created: " this.toString());
        }
    }
    
  • Application.java

    package com.example.factory;
    
    public class Application {
        public <T> T createDocument(Class<T> documentClass) {
            try {
                return documentClass.newInstance();
            } catch (InstantiationException e) {
                throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
            } catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
                throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
            }
        };
    }
    
  • Main.java

    package com.example.factory;
    
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Application application = new Application();
        application.createDocument(DrawingDocument.class);
    }
    
  • 文档.java

    package com.example.factory;
    
    public abstract class Document {
        public Document() {
            System.out.println("New Document instance created: " + this.toString());
        }
    }
    
  • 绘图文档.java

    package com.example.factory
    
    public class DrawingDocument extends Document {
        public DrawingDocument() {
            System.out.println("New DrawingDocument instance created: " this.toString());
        }
    }
    
  • 应用程序.java

    package com.example.factory;
    
    public class Application {
        public <T> T createDocument(Class<T> documentClass) {
            try {
                return documentClass.newInstance();
            } catch (InstantiationException e) {
                throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
            } catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
                throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
            }
        };
    }
    
  • 主程序

    package com.example.factory;
    
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Application application = new Application();
        application.createDocument(DrawingDocument.class);
    }
    

回答by Yet Another Geek

You should boundyour generic so that it is only using T's that inherit Document. example:

您应该绑定您的泛型,以便它仅使用继承 Document 的 T。例子:

public class Application {
    //Add extends Document after T
    public static <T extends Document> T createDocument(Class<T> documentClass) throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException {
        return documentClass.newInstance();
    };
}

回答by Roland Illig

The code looks good. In a real implementation the factory method should not be declared to throw any of the reflection-related exceptions. And you will probably have some different code anyway to create the document.

代码看起来不错。在实际实现中,不应将工厂方法声明为抛出任何与反射相关的异常。无论如何,您可能会有一些不同的代码来创建文档。

The faxtory method should take a Class<? extends Document>as its parameter, so that one cannot ask it to create a String, for example.

例如,faxtory 方法应该将 aClass<? extends Document>作为其参数,这样就不能要求它创建一个String

[update:] Code sample:

[更新:] 代码示例:

public Document createDocument(Class<? extends Document> clazz) {
  try {
    return clazz.newInstance();
  } catch (InstantiationException e) {
    throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
  }
}

回答by Grooveek

Where is the restriction to Document type in the factory ? Try

工厂对文件类型的限制在哪里?尝试

public <T extends Document> T createDocument(Class<T> documentClass) throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException {
    return documentClass.newInstance();
};