Ruby on Rails 的 WordPress 替代品是什么？
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4627231/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
What are the WordPress alternatives for Ruby on Rails?
提问by Olivier Lalonde
What are the WordPress alternatives for Ruby on Rails? How do they compare to WordPress?
Ruby on Rails 的 WordPress 替代品是什么？它们与 WordPress 相比如何？
回答by Tony
Refinerylooks really simple but I don't have an in depth comparison to WordPress. Looks like it has a lot less features but likely easier to maintain and extend upon. It's pretty standard to write really crappy code in the WordPress community.
Refinery看起来非常简单，但我没有与 WordPress 进行深入比较。看起来它的功能要少得多，但可能更容易维护和扩展。在 WordPress 社区中编写非常糟糕的代码是非常标准的。
回答by Jasper Kennis
I've been using WordPress more or less against my willfor about twofour years now (since I started using other frameworks(I've started to really love WP again)). I think there is no "good Rails alternative". Of course there are a lot of blog engines but none have as many plugins available or are as well known with clients. Let's be honest, WP has a fantastic front-end, clients seem to like that. The reason "we developers" look for Rails alternatives is obviously because Rails developer aren't comfortable with WP. But there's no platform out there that has the same out-of-the-box completeness and user friendliness as WP. For blog-like purposes that is of course.
我已经或多或少地违背我的意愿使用 WordPress大约两年了（自从我开始使用其他框架（我再次开始真正喜欢 WP））。我认为没有“好的 Rails 替代品”。当然，有很多博客引擎，但没有一个有那么多可用的插件，或者为客户所熟知。老实说，WP 有一个很棒的前端，客户似乎喜欢这样。“我们开发人员”寻找 Rails 替代品的原因显然是因为 Rails 开发人员对 WP 不满意。但是没有任何平台具有与 WP 相同的开箱即用的完整性和用户友好性。当然，出于类似博客的目的。
回答by kinnou02
回答by redcap3000
You may want to look into Wordscript; it includes API's written in Ruby and PHP that connects to existing WordPress databases and returns json structures (made from generated SQL).
你可能想看看Wordscript; 它包括用 Ruby 和 PHP 编写的 API，它们连接到现有的 WordPress 数据库并返回 json 结构（由生成的 SQL 制成）。
Useful if you want to keep full administrative features of WordPress, and have a somewhat simple WordPress site. Neither version requires WordPress to be installed locally, but you can't really do anything administrative with the api or comments/custom fields (yet). Also the API is much faster and consumes a fraction of the resources WordPress would.
如果您想保留 WordPress 的完整管理功能，并拥有一个稍微简单的 WordPress 站点，这将很有用。这两个版本都不需要在本地安装 WordPress，但您实际上无法对 api 或评论/自定义字段进行任何管理（目前）。此外，API 的速度要快得多，并且消耗的资源只是 WordPress 的一小部分。
