Java lambda 表达式中的错误返回类型
声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33085151/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
bad return type in lambda expression
提问by Roland Illig
The following code compiles fine in IntelliJ and Eclipse, but the JDK compiler 1.8.0_25 complains. First, the code.
以下代码在 IntelliJ 和 Eclipse 中编译良好,但 JDK 编译器 1.8.0_25 会报错。首先,代码。
import java.util.function.Predicate;
public abstract class MyStream<E> {
static <T> MyStream<T> create() {
return null;
}
abstract MyStream<E> filter(MyPredicate<? super E> predicate);
public interface MyPredicate<T> extends Predicate<T> {
@Override
boolean test(T t);
}
public void demo() {
MyStream.<Boolean> create().filter(b -> b);
MyStream.<String> create().filter(s -> s != null);
}
}
The output from javac 1.8.0_25 is:
javac 1.8.0_25 的输出是:
MyStream.java:18: error: incompatible types: incompatible parameter types in lambda expression
MyStream.<Boolean> create().filter(b -> b);
^
MyStream.java:18: error: incompatible types: bad return type in lambda expression
MyStream.<Boolean> create().filter(b -> b);
^
? super Boolean cannot be converted to boolean
MyStream.java:19: error: bad operand types for binary operator '!='
MyStream.<String> create().filter(s -> s != null);
^
first type: ? super String
second type: <null>
MyStream.java:19: error: incompatible types: incompatible parameter types in lambda expression
MyStream.<String> create().filter(s -> s != null);
^
Note: Some messages have been simplified; recompile with -Xdiags:verbose to get full output
4 errors
When I replace ? super E
with simply E
, JDK compiles successfully.
当我用simple替换? super E
时E
,JDK 编译成功。
When I replace filter(MyPredicate
with filter(Predicate
, JDK compiles successfully.
当我用 替换filter(MyPredicate
时filter(Predicate
,JDK 编译成功。
Since it works with JDK 1.8.0_60, I suspect it is a compiler bug.
由于它适用于 JDK 1.8.0_60,我怀疑这是一个编译器错误。
Any details on what caused this and when it has been fixed?
有关导致此问题的原因以及何时修复的任何详细信息?
采纳答案by ZhongYu
If a lambda expression appears in a target type with wildcards (as in most cases)
如果 lambda 表达式出现在带有通配符的目标类型中(在大多数情况下)
Consumer<? super Boolean> consumer = b->{...}
the question arises - what's the type of the lambda expression; in particular, the type of b
.
问题出现了 - lambda 表达式的类型是什么;特别是b
.
Of course, there could be many choices due to the wildcards; e.g. we could explicitly choose
当然,由于通配符,可能有很多选择;例如,我们可以明确地选择
Consumer<? super Boolean> consumer = (Object b)->{...}
However, implicitly, b
should be inferred as Boolean
. This makes sense since the consumer should only be fed with Boolean
anyway.
但是,隐含地,b
应该推断为Boolean
。这是有道理的,因为Boolean
无论如何都应该给消费者喂食。
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-15.html#jls-15.27.3
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-15.html#jls-15.27.3
If T is a wildcard-parameterized functional interface type and the lambda expression is implicitly typed, then the ground target type is the non-wildcard parameterization of T
如果 T 是通配符参数化的函数接口类型并且 lambda 表达式是隐式类型的,则基本目标类型是 T 的非通配符参数化
(This probably assumes that wildcards are use properly variance-wise on the target type; we might find some hilarious examples if the assumption doesn't hold)
(这可能假设通配符在目标类型上正确使用方差;如果假设不成立,我们可能会发现一些有趣的例子)
回答by Bohemian
<? super E>
includes Object
, which isn't a Boolean
. ie
<? super E>
包括Object
,它不是Boolean
. IE
MyPredicate<? super E>
Could be a
可能是一个
MyPredicate<Object>
and you can't return an Object
as a boolean
.
并且您不能将 anObject
作为boolean
.
Try changing your lambda to:
尝试将您的 lambda 更改为:
MyStream.<Boolean> create().filter(b -> Boolean.TRUE.equals(b));
which will compile and execute without error not matter the type of the stream, but will return true
for elements that are true
Boolean
values.
无论流的类型如何,它都会编译和执行而不会出错,但会返回值的true
元素true
Boolean
。