C# 将类类型作为参数传递

C# Passing a class type as a parameter

提问by apacay

This for C#? Passing Class type as a parameter

这是针对 C# 的？ 传递类类型作为参数

I have a class adapter that implements an Interface. I want to fill an array structure with MyFooClass instances where MyFooClass's name or reference I want to receive it from outside. I'll instantiate them inside my adapter code.

我有一个实现接口的类适配器。我想用 MyFooClass 实例填充数组结构，其中 MyFooClass 的名称或引用我想从外部接收它。我将在我的适配器代码中实例化它们。

For example:

例如：

    public void FillWsvcStructs(DataSet ds, ClassType Baz)
    {
        IFoo.Request = ds.DataTable[0].Request;
        IFoo.Modulebq = string.Empty;
        IFoo.Clasific = string.Empty;
        IFoo.Asignadoa = ds.DataTable[0].Referer;
        IFoo.Solicita = "Jean Paul Goitier";


        // Go with sub-Elems (Also "Interfaceated")
        foreach (DataSet.DataTableRow ar in ds.DataTable[1])
        {
            if ((int) ar.StatusOT != (int)Props.StatusOT.NotOT)
            {
                ///From HERE!
                IElemRequest req = new (Baz)(); // I don't know how to do it here
                ///To HERE!

                req.Id = string.Empty;
                req.Type = string.Empty;
                req.Num = string.Empty;
                req.Message = string.Empty;
                req.Trkorr = ar[1];
                TRequest.Add(req);
            }
        }
    }

采纳答案by Jesse C. Slicer

Genericsand their constraintsshould do what you want, I believe:

泛型和它们的约束应该做你想要什么，我相信：

public void FillWsvcStructs<ClassType>(DataSet ds) where ClassType : IElemRequest, new()
{
    IFoo.Request = ds.DataTable[0].Request;
    IFoo.Modulebq = string.Empty;
    IFoo.Clasific = string.Empty;
    IFoo.Asignadoa = ds.DataTable[0].Referer;
    IFoo.Solicita = "Jean Paul Goitier";


    // Go with sub-Elems (Also "Interfaceated")
    foreach (DataSet.DataTableRow ar in ds.DataTable[1])
    {
        if ((int) ar.StatusOT != (int)Props.StatusOT.NotOT)
        {
            IElemRequest req = new ClassType();

            req.Id = string.Empty;
            req.Type = string.Empty;
            req.Num = string.Empty;
            req.Message = string.Empty;
            req.Trkorr = ar[1];
            TRequest.Add(req);
        }
    }
}

回答by BrokenGlass

That's probably best solved by using generics:

这可能最好通过使用泛型来解决：

public void FillWsvcStructs<T>(DataSet ds) where T : IElemRequest, new()
{
   //..
   //new() constraint enables using default constructor     
   IElemRequest req = new T(); 
   //IElemRequest constraint enables using interface properties
   req.Id = string.Empty;
   //..
 }

If you have multiple types that you need to be able to access/instantiate, the declaration follows the same rules (as may easily be gathered from msdn):

如果您有多种类型需要访问/实例化，则声明遵循相同的规则（很容易从 msdn 中收集到）：

public void FillWsvcStructs<T, U, V>() where T : IElemRequest, new() 
                                       where U : IFoo, new()
                                       where V : IBar, new()
{

    //..
}

回答by FishBasketGordo

You need a generic:

你需要一个通用的：

public void FillWsvcStructs<TBaz>(DataSet ds) where TBaz : IElementRequest, new()
{
    // ...
    IElementRequest req = new TBaz();
    // ...
}

The generic constraint ("where...") enforces that the type you pass in implements the IElementRequestinterface and that it has a parameter-less constructor.

泛型约束 (" where...") 强制您传入的类型实现IElementRequest接口并且它具有无参数构造函数。

Assuming you had a class Bazsimilar to this:

假设你有一个Baz类似的类：

public class Baz : IElementRequest
{
    public Baz()
    {
    }
}

You would invoke this method like so:

你会像这样调用这个方法：

DataSet ds = new DataSet();
FillWsvcStructs<Baz>(ds);

---

---

Addendum

附录

Multiple, different, generic type parameters can each have there own type constraint:

多个不同的泛型类型参数每个都可以有自己的类型约束：

public void FillWsvcStructs<TFoo, TBar, TBaz>(DataSet ds) 
    where TFoo : IFoo, new()
    where TBar : IBar, new()
    where TBaz : IElementRequest, new()
{
    // ...
    IFoo foo = new TFoo();
    IBar bar = new TBar();
    IElementRequest req = new TBaz();
    // ...
}

回答by DaveShaw

I think you want generics.

我想你想要泛型。

Declare your method like this:

像这样声明你的方法：

public void FillWsvcStructs<T>(DataSet ds)
    where T : IElemRequest, new()
{
    //You can then do
    IElemRequest req = new T();

}

The new()constraint requires Tto have a public parameterless constructor, and the IElemRequestconstraint ensures it implements IElemRequest.

该new()约束要求T有一个公共的无参数的构造函数，而IElemRequest约束可以确保它实现IElemRequest。

回答by 48klocs

You probably want to use Activator.CreateInstance.

您可能想要使用Activator.CreateInstance。

IElemRequest req = (IElemRequest) Activator.CreateInstance(Baz);

IElemRequest req = (IElemRequest) Activator.CreateInstance(Baz);

If the type that Bazrepresents has a constructor that takes parameters, the complexity of that will grow (as you'll have to use Reflection or dynamic calls to make it work). If Bazdoesn't represent a type that inherits from IElemRequest, you will get an ugly runtime error.

如果Baz表示的类型具有带参数的构造函数，则其复杂性将会增加（因为您必须使用反射或动态调用才能使其工作）。如果Baz不代表从 继承的类型IElemRequest，您将得到一个难看的运行时错误。

回答by Mikael

The method:

方法：

public void FillWsvcStructs<T>(DataSet ds) where T : IElemRequest, new() {
    ...
    IElemRequest req = new T();
    ...
}

Calling the method:

调用方法：

FillWsvcStructs<Bez>(ds);