asp.net-mvc RenderPartial 来自另一个控制器（和另一个文件夹中）的视图
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2879733/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
RenderPartial a view from another controller (and in another folder)
提问by George Silva
I two database entities that i need to represent and i need to output them in a single page.
我需要表示两个数据库实体，我需要在单个页面中输出它们。
I have something like this
我有这样的事情
Views Def ViewA ViewB Test ViewC
视图定义视图A 视图B 测试视图C
I want to ViewC to display ViewA, which displays ViewB.
我想ViewC显示ViewA，它显示ViewB。
Right now i'm using something like this:
现在我正在使用这样的东西：
// View C
<!-- bla -->
<% Html.RenderPartial(Url.Content("../Definition/DefinitionDetails"), i); %>
// View A
<!-- bla -->
<% Html.RenderPartial(Url.Content("../Definition/DefinitionEditActions")); %>
Is there a better to do this? I find that linking with relative pathnames can burn you. Any tips?
有没有更好的方法来做到这一点？我发现与相对路径名的链接可能会让您感到不适。有小费吗？
Any chance I can make somehtiing like...
任何机会我都可以做一些像...
Html.RenderPartial("Definition","DefinitionDetails",i); ?
Html.RenderPartial("Definition","DefinitionDetails",i); ?
Thanks for the help
谢谢您的帮助
回答by Ravinder Singh Bhanwar
this is works for me!
这对我有用！
@Html.Partial("~/Views/NewsFeeds/NewsFeedPartial.cshtml")
回答by Matt Sherman
You can refer to Views with full paths, like:
您可以参考具有完整路径的视图，例如：
Html.RenderPartial("~/Views/Definition/DefinitionDetails")
Even better, use the T4MVC library, which does the above and makes it (quasi-) strongly-typed. You can refer to any view from any controller or view. You use it like this:
更好的是，使用T4MVC 库，它执行上述操作并使其（准）强类型。您可以从任何控制器或视图引用任何视图。你像这样使用它：
Html.RenderPartial(MVC.Definition.Views.DefinitionDetails)
or
或者
Html.RenderPartial(MVC.Definition.Views.DefinitionDetails, myModel)
回答by Gone Coding
Just to clarify which options work exactly:
只是为了澄清哪些选项有效：
1) The extension of the view file isrequired if you supply a path.
1)如果您提供路径，则需要视图文件的扩展名。
2) If you do not supply a path, do not supply the extension.
2) 如果您不提供路径，请不要提供扩展名。
The examples below assume cshtml files.
下面的示例假设 cshtml 文件。
Use RenderPartialin a code block:
使用RenderPartial一个代码块：
// This looks in default view folder, then shared, checking for .aspx, .cshtml etc
Html.RenderPartial("DefinitionDetails");
// This looks in specified path and requires the extension
Html.RenderPartial("~/Views/Definition/DefinitionDetails.cshtml");
Use Partialfor inline Razor syntax:
使用Partial内联剃刀语法：
// This looks in default view folder, then shared, checking for .aspx, .cshtml etc
@Html.Partial("DefinitionDetails")
// This looks in specified path and requires the extension
@Html.Partial("~/Views/Definition/DefinitionDetails.cshtml")
Note: Apparently RenderPartialis slightly faster than Partial, but I also expect fully pathed names will be a faster than letting MVC search for the file.
注意：显然RenderPartial比 略快Partial，但我也希望全路径名称比让 MVC 搜索文件更快。
If you are producing partials in a loop (i.e. from a collection in your view model), it is likely you will need to pass through specific viewmodels:
如果您在循环中生成部分（即从您的视图模型中的集合），您可能需要通过特定的视图模型：
e.g.
例如
@foreach (var group in orderedGroups)
{
Html.RenderPartial("~/Views/ControllerName/ViewName.cshtml", group);
}
I just had to do all this on a project and found the marked answer a little misleading.
我只需要在一个项目上完成所有这些，发现标记的答案有点误导。
回答by ridecar2
Could you not copy the partials into the shared folder then just do:
你能不能不将部分复制到共享文件夹然后做：
<% Html.RenderPartial("DefinitionDetails", i); %>and
<% Html.RenderPartial("DefinitionDetails", i); %>和
<% Html.RenderPartial("DefinitionEditActions"); %>
<% Html.RenderPartial("DefinitionEditActions"); %>
