PostgreSQL - 只允许 DB 用户调用函数
声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15867175/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
PostgreSQL - DB user should only be allowed to call functions
提问by lefthy
Currently I'm using PostgreSQL for my application. Since I am trying to put every SQL that contains a transaction (i.e. insert, update, delete) in a function, I stumbled upon this problem:
目前我在我的应用程序中使用 PostgreSQL。由于我试图将包含事务(即插入、更新、删除)的每个 SQL 放在一个函数中,我偶然发现了这个问题:
Is it possible that a database user may only be allowed to call functions and Select-Statements while he can not call SQL-Statements which contains a transaction? By "call functions" I mean any function. Regardless if it contains a transaction or not.
是否有可能只允许数据库用户调用函数和 Select-Statements 而不能调用包含事务的 SQL-Statements?“调用函数”是指任何函数。不管它是否包含交易。
I already tried to create a user which can only call functions and Select-Statements. But I always end up with an error, when calling functions which contains transactions. For what I understand a dbuser needs write permissions if a he calls a function which uses an insert, update or delete statement.
我已经尝试创建一个只能调用函数和选择语句的用户。但是在调用包含事务的函数时,我总是以错误告终。据我了解,如果 dbuser 调用使用插入、更新或删除语句的函数,则他需要写权限。
Am I missing something? Is this scenario really not possible? Security-wise this would be really great because you pretty much prevent SQL-injection in the first place.
我错过了什么吗?这种场景真的不可能吗?在安全方面,这真的很棒,因为您一开始就几乎可以防止 SQL 注入。
回答by Erwin Brandstetter
There is no "privilege on SELECT
". All you need is the privilege to EXECUTE
functions. Relevant function can run with SECURITY DEFINER
to inherit all privileges of the owner. To restrict possible privilege escalation to a minimum a priori, make a daemon role own relevant functions with only the necessary privileges - not a superuser!
没有“特权SELECT
”。您所需要的只是EXECUTE
功能的特权。相关函数可以运行SECURITY DEFINER
以继承所有者的所有权限。要将可能的权限提升限制到最低限度,请使守护程序角色拥有仅具有必要权限的相关功能 - 而不是超级用户!
Recipe
食谱
As superuser ...
作为超级用户...
Create a non-superuser role myuser
.
创建一个非超级用户角色myuser
。
CREATE ROLE myuser PASSWORD ...;
Create a group role mygroup
and make myuser
member in it.
创建一个组角色mygroup
并使其成为myuser
成员。
CREATE ROLE mygroup;
GRANT mygroup TO myuser;
You may want to add more users just like myuser
later.
您可能希望像myuser
稍后一样添加更多用户。
Do not grant any privileges at allto myuser
.
Only grant these to mygroup
:
不要完全不授予任何权限到myuser
。
仅将这些授予mygroup
:
GRANT CONNECT ON DATABASE mydb TO mygroup;
GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA public TO mygroup;
GRANT EXECUTE ON FUNCTION foo() TO mygroup;
GRANT CONNECT ON DATABASE mydb TO mygroup;
GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA public TO mygroup;
GRANT EXECUTE ON FUNCTION foo() TO mygroup;
Remove allprivileges for public
that myuser
shouldn't have.
删除所有权限public
是myuser
不应该有。
REVOKE ALL ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA myschema FROM public;
There may be more. I quote the manual:
可能还有更多。我引用手册:
PostgreSQL grants default privileges on some types of objects to
PUBLIC
. No privileges are granted to PUBLIC by default on tables, columns, schemas or tablespaces. For other types, the default privileges granted to PUBLIC are as follows:CONNECT
andCREATE TEMP TABLE
for databases;EXECUTE
privilege for functions; andUSAGE
privilege for languages. The object owner can, of course,REVOKE
both default and expressly granted privileges. (For maximum security, issue theREVOKE
in the same transaction that creates the object; then there is no window in which another user can use the object.) Also, these initial default privilege settings can be changed using theALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
command.
PostgreSQL 将某些类型对象的默认权限授予
PUBLIC
. 默认情况下,不会向 PUBLIC 授予对表、列、模式或表空间的任何权限。对于其他类型,是授予PUBLIC的默认权限如下:CONNECT
和CREATE TEMP TABLE
为数据库;EXECUTE
功能特权;和USAGE
语言特权。当然,对象所有者可以REVOKE
默认和明确授予的权限。(为了获得最大的安全性,请REVOKE
在创建对象的同一事务中发出;然后没有其他用户可以使用该对象的窗口。)此外,可以使用ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
命令更改这些初始默认权限设置。
Create a daemon roleto ownrelevant functions.
创建守护进程角色以拥有相关功能。
CREATE ROLE mydaemon;
Grant only privileges necessary to execute these functions to mydaemon
, (including EXECUTE ON FUNCTION
to allow another function to be called). Again, you can use group roles to bundle privileges and grant them to mydaemon
仅授予 , 执行这些函数所需的权限mydaemon
(包括EXECUTE ON FUNCTION
允许调用另一个函数)。同样,您可以使用组角色来捆绑权限并将它们授予mydaemon
GRANT bundle1 TO mydaemon;
In addition you can use DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
to automatically grant certain privileges for future objects to a bundle or the daemon directly:
此外,您可以使用DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
自动将未来对象的某些权限授予捆绑包或守护程序:
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA myschema GRANT SELECT ON TABLES TO bundle1;
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA myschema GRANT USAGE ON SEQUENCES TO bundle1;
This applies only to the role it is executed for. Per the documentation:
这仅适用于为其执行的角色。根据文档:
If
FOR ROLE
is omitted, the current role is assumed.
如果
FOR ROLE
省略,则假定当前角色。
To also cover pre-existing objects in the schema (see rob's comment):
还要涵盖模式中预先存在的对象(请参阅rob 的评论):
GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO bundle1;
GRANT USAGE ON ALL SEQUENCES IN SCHEMA public TO bundle1;
Make mydaemon
own relevant functions. Could look like this:
制定mydaemon
自己的相关功能。看起来像这样:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo()
...
SECURITY DEFINER SET search_path = myschema, pg_temp;
ALTER FUNCTION foo() OWNER TO mydaemon;
REVOKE EXECUTE ON FUNCTION foo() FROM public;
GRANT EXECUTE ON FUNCTION foo() TO mydaemon;
GRANT EXECUTE ON FUNCTION foo() TO mygroup;
-- possibly others ..
###Note
Due to this bugin the current version 1.16.1 of pgAdminthe necessary command
###Note
由于当前版本 1.16.1 的pgAdmin 中的此错误,需要的命令
REVOKE EXECUTE ON FUNCTION foo() FROM public;
REVOKE EXECUTE ON FUNCTION foo() FROM public;
is missing in the reverse engineered DDL script. Remember to add it, when recreating.
This bug is fixed in the current version pgAdmin 1.18.1.
在逆向工程 DDL 脚本中丢失。记得在重新创建时添加它。
此错误已在当前版本 pgAdmin 1.18.1 中修复。