C++ 错误:使用删除的功能。为什么?

声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow 原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26749505/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me): StackOverFlow

提示:将鼠标放在中文语句上可以显示对应的英文。显示中英文
时间:2020-08-28 11:41:17  来源:igfitidea点击:

error: use of deleted function. Why?

c++c++11gcc4.8

提问by quant

I am trying to create a function that applies an arbitrary functor Fto every element of a provided tuple:

我正在尝试创建一个将任意函子应用于F提供的元组的每个元素的函数:

#include <functional>
#include <tuple>

// apply a functor to every element of a tuple
namespace Detail {

template <std::size_t i, typename Tuple, typename F>
typename std::enable_if<i != std::tuple_size<Tuple>::value>::type
ForEachTupleImpl(Tuple& t, F& f)
{
    f(std::get<i>(t));
    ForEachTupleImpl<i+1>(t, f);
}

template <std::size_t i, typename Tuple, typename F>
typename std::enable_if<i == std::tuple_size<Tuple>::value>::type
ForEachTupleImpl(Tuple& t, F& f)
{
}

}

template <typename Tuple, typename F>
void ForEachTuple(Tuple& t, F& f)
{
    Detail::ForEachTupleImpl<0>(t, f);
}

struct A
{
    A() : a(0) {}
    A(A& a) = delete;
    A(const A& a) = delete;

    int a;
};

int main()
{
    // create a tuple of types and initialise them with zeros
    using T = std::tuple<A, A, A>;
    T t;

    // creator a simple function object that increments the objects member
    struct F
    {
        void operator()(A& a) const { a.a++; }
    } f;

    // if this works I should end up with a tuple of A's with members equal to 1
    ForEachTuple(t, f);
    return 0;
}

Live code example: http://ideone.com/b8nLCy

实时代码示例:http: //ideone.com/b8nLCy

I don't want to create copies of Abecause it might be expensive (obviously in this example it is not) so I deleted the copy constructor. When I run the above program I get:

我不想创建 的副本,A因为它可能很昂贵(在这个例子中显然不是)所以我删除了复制构造函数。当我运行上述程序时,我得到:

/usr/include/c++/4.8/tuple:134:25: error: use of deleted function ‘A::A(const A&)'
       : _M_head_impl(__h) { }
/usr/include/c++/4.8/tuple:134:25: error: use of deleted function ‘A::A(const A&)'
       : _M_head_impl(__h) { }

I know that the constructor is deleted (that was intentional) but what I don't understand is why it is trying to make copies of my struct. Why is this happening, and how can I achieve this without copying A?

我知道构造函数被删除了(这是故意的),但我不明白的是为什么它试图复制我的结构。为什么会发生这种情况,我如何在不复制的情况下实现这一目标A

回答by Ben Voigt

This is the problem you're getting a "deleted constructor" error for:

这是您收到“已删除构造函数”错误的问题:

std::function<void(A)> f = [](A& a) { a.a++; };

You're trying to set up a std::functionthat passes an Aby value. But A, having no copy-constructor, can't be passed by value.

您正在尝试设置std::function一个A通过值传递的。但是A,没有复制构造函数,不能按值传递。

Try matching the actual argument type more carefully:

尝试更仔细地匹配实际参数类型:

std::function<void(A&)> f = [](A& a) { a.a++; };

But since you aren't capturing variables, you can simply try

但是由于您没有捕获变量,您可以简单地尝试

void(*f)(A&) = [](A& a) { a.a++; };

You've also got a major problem with the base case of your template recursion: even if you get enable_ifworking, which it seems not to be, you'll have an ambiguous call. I think you need to also disablethe main case.

您的模板递归的基本情况也有一个主要问题:即使您开始enable_if工作(似乎并非如此),您也会遇到模棱两可的调用。我认为您还需要禁用主要案例。

回答by Dietmar Kühl

When instantiating std::function<void(A)>a function with a signature taking an Aby value is instantiated. To synthesize this function definition a copy or a move of Ais needed. Since Ais non-copyable but not made movable, such a constructor doesn't exist.

当实例化std::function<void(A)>一个带有A按值的签名的函数时被实例化。要综合此函数定义,需要复制或移动A。由于A不可复制但不可移动,因此不存在这样的构造函数。

Of course, there is also this funny thing:

当然,也有这么搞笑的事情:

T t();

which declares a function return a Tby value requiring a copy. When calling ForEachTuple(t, f)this function is referenced and instantiated. You may want to replace this declaration by one of

它声明一个函数返回一个T需要副本的值。调用ForEachTuple(t, f)此函数时会被引用和实例化。您可能希望用以下之一替换此声明

T t;
T t{};

(in the answer above I had only looked at the first problem I spotted).

(在上面的答案中,我只看了我发现的第一个问题)。