postgresql 防止 GROUP BY 中的行重复计算
声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12715231/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Keeping rows from double-counting in a GROUP BY
提问by ldrg
Here's the basic guts of my schema and problem: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!1/72ec9/4/0
这是我的架构和问题的基本内容:http: //sqlfiddle.com/#!1/72ec9/4/0
Note that the periods table can refer to a variable range of time - it could be an entire season, it could be a few games or one game. For a given team and year all period rows represent exclusive ranges of time.
请注意,周期表可以指代一个可变的时间范围——可以是整个赛季,也可以是几场比赛或一场比赛。对于给定的团队和年份,所有期间行都代表专有的时间范围。
I've got a query written which joins up tables and uses a GROUP BY periods.year to aggregate scores for a season (see sqlfiddle). However, if a coach had two positions in the same year the GROUP BY will count the same period row twice. How can I ditch the duplicates when a coach held two positions but still sum up periods when a year is comprised of multiple periods? If there's a better way to do the schema I'd also appreciate it if you pointed it out to me.
我编写了一个查询,它连接表并使用 GROUP BY period.year 来汇总一个季节的分数(请参阅 sqlfiddle)。但是,如果教练在同一年有两个职位,则 GROUP BY 会将同一时期的行计算两次。当一名教练担任两个职位但仍然总结一年由多个时期组成的时期时,我该如何摆脱重复?如果有更好的方法来执行架构,如果您向我指出它,我也会很感激。
回答by Erwin Brandstetter
The underlying problem(join to multiple tables with multiple matches) is explained in this closely related answer:
将潜在的问题(加入与多个匹配多个表)在此密切相关的答案解释:
To fix, I first simplifiedyour query:
为了解决这个问题,我首先简化了您的查询:
select pe.year
, sum(pe.wins) AS wins
, sum(pe.losses) AS losses
, sum(pe.ties) AS ties
, array_agg(po.id) AS position_id
, array_agg(po.name) AS position_names
from periods_positions_coaches_linking pp
join positions po ON po.id = pp.position
join periods pe ON pe.id = pp.period
where pp.coach = 1
group by pe.year
order by pe.year;
Yields the same, incorrectresult as your original, but simpler / faster / easier to read.
产生与原始结果相同但不正确的结果,但更简单/更快/更易于阅读。
No point in joining the table
coach
as long as you don't use columns in theSELECT
list. I removed it completely and replaced theWHERE
condition withwhere pp.coach = 1
.You don't need
COALESCE
.NULL
values are ignored in the aggregate functionsum()
. No need to substitute0
.Use table aliases to make it easier to read.
coach
只要您不使用SELECT
列表中的列,就没有必要加入表格。我完全删除了它并WHERE
用where pp.coach = 1
.你不需要
COALESCE
.NULL
值在聚合函数中被忽略sum()
。无需替换0
。使用表别名使其更易于阅读。
Next, I solvedyour problem like this:
接下来,我像这样解决了你的问题:
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT pe.year
, array_agg(DISTINCT po.id) AS position_id
, array_agg(DISTINCT po.name) AS position_names
FROM periods_positions_coaches_linking pp
JOIN positions po ON po.id = pp.position
JOIN periods pe ON pe.id = pp.period
WHERE pp.coach = 1
GROUP BY pe.year
) po
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT pe.year
, sum(pe.wins) AS wins
, sum(pe.losses) AS losses
, sum(pe.ties) AS ties
FROM (
SELECT period
FROM periods_positions_coaches_linking
WHERE coach = 1
GROUP BY period
) pp
JOIN periods pe ON pe.id = pp.period
GROUP BY pe.year
) pe USING (year)
ORDER BY year;
Aggregate positions and periods separately before joining them.
In the first sub-querylist positions only once by simply using
DISTINCT
.In the second sub-query
GROUP BY period
, because a coach can have multiple positions per period.JOIN
to periods-data afterthat, and then aggregate to get sums.
在加入之前分别汇总头寸和期间。
在第一个子查询列表中,只需使用
DISTINCT
.在第二个子查询中
GROUP BY period
,因为教练每个时期可以有多个职位。JOIN
以期数据后说,然后汇总得到的款项。
回答by Teena Thomas
use distinct
as shown here
使用distinct
如这里
code:
代码:
select periods.year as year,
sum(coalesce(periods.wins, 0)) as wins,
sum(coalesce(periods.losses, 0)) as losses,
sum(coalesce(periods.ties, 0)) as ties,
array_agg( distinct positions.id) as position_id,
array_agg( distinct positions.name) as position_names
from periods_positions_coaches_linking
join coaches on coaches.id = periods_positions_coaches_linking.coach
join positions on positions.id = periods_positions_coaches_linking.position
join periods on periods.id = periods_positions_coaches_linking.period
where coaches.id = 1
group by periods.year, positions.id
order by periods.year;
回答by Gordon Linoff
In your case, the easiest way might be to divide out the positions:
在您的情况下,最简单的方法可能是划分职位:
select periods.year as year,
sum(coalesce(periods.wins, 0))/COUNT(distinct positions.id) as wins,
sum(coalesce(periods.losses, 0))/COUNT(distinct positions.id) as losses,
sum(coalesce(periods.ties, 0))/COUNT(distinct positions.id) as ties,
array_agg(distinct positions.id) as position_id,
array_agg(distinct positions.name) as position_names
from periods_positions_coaches_linking join
coaches
on coaches.id = periods_positions_coaches_linking.coach join
positions
on positions.id = periods_positions_coaches_linking.position join
periods
on periods.id = periods_positions_coaches_linking.period
where coaches.id = 1
group by periods.year
order by periods.year;
The number of positions scales the wins, losses, and ties, so dividing it out adjusts the counts.
头寸数量可以衡量胜负和平局,因此将其除以调整计数。