如何在 GCC 和 Xcode 中手动抛出编译器错误

声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow 原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2994490/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me): StackOverFlow

提示:将鼠标放在中文语句上可以显示对应的英文。显示中英文
时间:2020-09-14 19:25:53  来源:igfitidea点击:

How to manually throw a compiler error in GCC and Xcode

iphoneobjective-cxcodegcccompiler-construction

提问by coneybeare

In xcode, while compiling apps with gcc, I want to throw compilation time errors if things like NSZombieEnabled is on for a distribution release, thus ensuring that compilation will fail and I won't accidentally do something stupid.

在 xcode 中,在使用 gcc 编译应用程序时,如果诸如 NSZombieEnabled 之类的东西在发行版中启用,我想抛出编译时间错误,从而确保编译会失败并且我不会意外地做一些愚蠢的事情。

I did some googling, but could not figure out how to cause the compiler to bail if a certain condition is met. Surely it must be easy, am I just not finding it?

我做了一些谷歌搜索,但无法弄清楚如果满足某个条件,如何使编译器保释。当然它一定很容易,我只是没有找到它吗?

回答by Mark Rushakoff

Use the #errordirective:

使用#error指令

#if SHOULD_FAIL
#error "bad compiler!"
#endif

int main()
{
    return 0;
}
$ gcc a.c -DSHOULD_FAIL=0 # passes fine
$ gcc a.c -DSHOULD_FAIL=1
a.c:2:2: error: #error "bad compiler!"

Since NSZombieEnabledis an environment variable, you'll need to do something clever in your build script to define your macro as zero or one.

由于NSZombieEnabled是一个环境变量,您需要在构建脚本中做一些聪明的事情来将宏定义为零或一。

Strictly speaking, the #errordirective occurs in the C Preprocessor, not gcc. But that shouldn't matter in the case you've described.

严格来说,该#error指令出现在 C 预处理器中,而不是gcc. 但这在你描述的情况下应该无关紧要。

回答by Joseph Quinsey

A complile-time assert()--a.k.a. static assert--may be helpful. Here is mine, derived mostly from http://www.pixelbeat.org/programming/gcc/static_assert.html:

编译时 assert()——又名静态断言——可能会有所帮助。这是我的,主要来自http://www.pixelbeat.org/programming/gcc/static_assert.html

/*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *  Compile-time ASSERT(). Similar to the BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(). And the C++0x
 *  static_assert(), which also has a parameter for a useless error message
 *  (see correction!). Our ASSERT() can be placed anywhere in the code, except:
 *
 *  o In a twice-included header file, without a #ifndef...#endif wrapper.
 *  o In the middle of a structure definition (or enum definition).
 *  o In C89 or C90, after a statement. But you can wrap it in braces!
 *
 *  If you want stick something in the middle of a structure definition
 *  you'll need to use the ugly, three-line construct #if...#error...#endif.
 *  And if you do do this, the pre-processor has a much more limited idea of
 *  what a "constant expression" is.
 *
 *  This is a refinement of ideas from the web (www.pixebeat.org is good). It
 *  is shorter than BOOST. And, I believe, is better than Linus Torvald's
 *  suggestion for an improved BUILD_BUG_ON(). And the do{...}while(0) wrapper
 *  you commonly see is totally inapplicable here: it limits permissible
 *  locations.
 *
 *  The web has many suggestions using arrays with a negative index. But with
 *  GCC, most of these do not detect a NON-CONSTANT arg (which is easy enough
 *  to do in error), except for the attractive 'extern int foo[expression]',
 *  which also gives an 'unused variable' warning (which might be fixable via
 *  (void)foo). GCC 4.3 apparently has a built-in static_assert(). Update:
 *  typedef int array[expression] seems also to be good.
 */
#define CONCAT_TOKENS(a, b) a ## b
#define EXPAND_THEN_CONCAT(a,b) CONCAT_TOKENS(a, b)
#define ASSERT(e) enum {EXPAND_THEN_CONCAT(ASSERT_line_,__LINE__) = 1/!!(e)}

But I corrected my opinion about the 'useless' message in C++0x:

但我更正了我对 C++0x 中“无用”消息的看法:

/*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *  Correction!: The message in static_assert() isn't quite useless, and we've
 *  added it to ASSERTM(). This is needed for the case where two different
 *  header files happen by chance to have two ASSERT()'s on the same line, or
 *  likewise for a source file and a header file.
 *
 *  We could also handle this via __COUNTER__, but this isn't supported by
 *  the SGI compiler (and is uglier). And we can't use __FILE__, because it
 *  doesn't usually expand to a valid C token (e.g. it has a dot c or dot h).
 */
#define ASSERTM(e,m) enum{EXPAND_THEN_CONCAT(m##_ASSERT_line_,__LINE__)=1/!!(e)}

Some examples:

一些例子:

/*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *  Example:
 */
ASSERTM (sizeof (int16) == 2, my_global_header_h);
ASSERTM (sizeof (ord32) == 4, my_global_header_h);
ASSERTM (sizeof (int64) == 8, my_global_header_h);

/*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *  Equally good, I believe, is the following variant, but it is slightly
 *  longer (and not used by us at the present time):
 */
#define ASSERTt(e) typedef int EXPAND_THEN_CONCAT(ASSERT_line_,__LINE__)[1-2*!(e)]

回答by fbrereto

NSZombieEnabledis an environment flag and, to my knowledge, should not affect the resulting binary (though it may affect the speed of the compilation.)

NSZombieEnabled是一个环境标志,据我所知,不应影响生成的二进制文件(尽管它可能会影响编译速度。)

回答by Dave DeLong

Another interesting thing you can do is manipulate the output of your build script. If you're using a custom build script as part of your build process, you can do something like:

您可以做的另一件有趣的事情是操作构建脚本的输出。如果您在构建过程中使用自定义构建脚本,您可以执行以下操作:

echo "error: this build step failed!"

Or:

或者:

echo "warning: this build step could be potentially faulty"

Those will produce errors or warnings (respectively) that will show up in the build results window. I've used this a couple times, and it's reallyuseful.

这些将产生错误或警告(分别)并显示在构建结果窗口中。我已经用过几次了,它真的很有用。