Linux glibc 检测到 free():下一个大小无效(快速)
声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9073148/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
glibc detected free(): invalid next size (fast)
提问by Wade G
This code generates random numbers and then produces a histogram based on input to the functions regarding the intervals. "bins" represents the histogram intervals and "bin_counts" holds the number of random numbers in a given interval.
此代码生成随机数,然后根据有关间隔的函数的输入生成直方图。“bins”表示直方图间隔,“bin_counts”保存给定间隔内随机数的数量。
I've reviewed several of the posts dealing with similiar issues and I understand that I'm out of bounds in the memory somewhere but GBD only points me to the "free(bins);" at the end of the code. I've double-checked my array lengths and I think they are all correct in terms of not accessing elements that don't exist/writing to memory not allocated. The weird thing is that the code works as intended, it produces an accuarate histogram, now I just need helping cleaning up this free() invalid next size error. If anybody has any suggestions I would be much obliged. The whole output is :
我已经查看了一些处理类似问题的帖子,我知道我在某处的内存中超出了界限,但 GBD 只将我指向“free(bins);” 在代码的末尾。我已经仔细检查了我的数组长度,我认为它们在不访问不存在的元素/写入未分配的内存方面都是正确的。奇怪的是代码按预期工作,它产生了一个准确的直方图,现在我只需要帮助清理这个 free() 无效的下一个大小错误。如果有人有任何建议,我将非常感激。整个输出是:
glibc detected./file: free(): invalid next size (fast): 0x8429008
glibc 检测到./file: free(): 下一个大小无效(快速):0x8429008
followed by a bunch of addresses in memory, seperated by Backtrace and Memory Map. The Backtrace only points me towards line 129, which is "free(bins);". Thanks in advance
后面是一堆内存地址,由Backtrace和Memory Map分开。回溯仅将我指向第 129 行,即“free(bins);”。提前致谢
#include "stdio.h"
#include "string.h"
#include "stdlib.h"
void histo(int N, double m, double M, int nbins, int *bin_counts, double *bins);
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
int *ptr_bin_counts;
double *ptr_bins;
histo(5,0.0,11.0,4, ptr_bin_counts, ptr_bins);
return 0;
}
void histo(int N, double m, double M, int nbins, int *bin_counts, double *bins)
{
srand(time(NULL));
int i,j,k,x,y;
double interval;
int randoms[N-1];
int temp_M = (int)M;
int temp_m = (int)m;
interval = (M-m) /((double)nbins);
//allocating mem to arrays
bins =(double*)malloc(nbins * sizeof(double));
bin_counts =(int*)malloc((nbins-1) * sizeof(int));
//create bins from intervals
for(j=0; j<=(nbins); j++)
{
bins[j] = m + (j*interval);
}
//generate "bin_counts[]" with all 0's
for(y=0; y<=(nbins-1); y++)
{
bin_counts[y] = 0;
}
//Generate "N" random numbers in "randoms[]" array
for(k =0; k<=(N-1); k++)
{
randoms[k] = rand() % (temp_M + temp_m);
printf("The random number is %d \n", randoms[k]);
}
//histogram code
for(i=0; i<=(N-1); i++)
{
for(x=0; x<=(nbins-1); x++)
{
if( (double)randoms[i]<=bins[x+1] && (double)randoms[i]>=bins[x] )
{
bin_counts[x] = bin_counts[x] + 1;
}
}
}
free(bins);
free(bin_counts);
}
采纳答案by Daniel Fischer
bins =(double*)malloc(nbins * sizeof(double));
bin_counts =(int*)malloc((nbins-1) * sizeof(int));
//create bins from intervals
for(j=0; j<=(nbins); j++)
{
bins[j] = m + (j*interval);
}
//generate "bin_counts[]" with all 0's
for(y=0; y<=(nbins-1); y++)
{
bin_counts[y] = 0;
}
You are overstepping your arrays, you allocate place for nbins
doubles but write to nbins+1
locations, and use nbins
locations for bin_counts
but have only allocated nbins-1
.
您超出了数组,为nbins
双打分配了位置但写入了nbins+1
位置,并使用了nbins
位置bin_counts
但仅分配了nbins-1
.