typescript for-in 语句
声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12950681/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
for-in statement
提问by Ido Ran
TypeScript docs say nothing about loop like for
or for-in
. From playing with the language it seems that only any
or string
variables are supported in for
loop.
TypeScript 文档没有提到像for
或这样的循环for-in
。从使用语言看来,循环中似乎只支持any
或string
变量for
。
Why has this decision been made?
为什么做出这个决定?
Why not use the type information and have strongly-typed iteration variable?
为什么不使用类型信息并具有强类型迭代变量?
采纳答案by Fenton
The for-in statement is really there to enumerate over object properties, which is how it is implemented in TypeScript. There are some issues with using it on arrays.
for-in 语句确实用于枚举对象属性,这就是它在 TypeScript 中的实现方式。在数组上使用它存在一些问题。
I can't speak on behalf of the TypeScript team, but I believe this is the reason for the implementation in the language.
我不能代表 TypeScript 团队发言,但我相信这是在语言中实现的原因。
回答by brianbruff
回答by Ryan Cavanaugh
TypeScript isn't giving you a gun to shoot yourself in the foot with.
TypeScript 并没有给你一把枪来用脚射击自己。
The iterator variable is a string because it is a string, full stop. Observe:
迭代器变量是一个字符串,因为它是一个字符串,句号。观察:
var obj = {};
obj['0'] = 'quote zero quote';
obj[0.0] = 'zero point zero';
obj['[object Object]'] = 'literal string "[object Object]"';
obj[<any>obj] = 'this obj'
obj[<any>undefined] = 'undefined';
obj[<any>"undefined"] = 'the literal string "undefined"';
for(var key in obj) {
console.log('Type: ' + typeof key);
console.log(key + ' => ' + obj[key]);
}
How many key/value pairs are in obj
now? 6, more or less? No, 3, and all of the keys are strings:
现在有多少键/值对obj
?6、多还是少?不,3,所有的键都是字符串:
Type: string
0 => zero point zero
Type: string
[object Object] => this obj;
Type: string
undefined => the literal string "undefined"
回答by citykid
edit 2018: This is outdated, js and typescript now have for..of loops.
http://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/iterators-and-generators.html
2018 年编辑:这已经过时了,js 和 typescript 现在有 for..of 循环。
http://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/iterators-and-generators.html
The book "TypeScript Revealed" says
“TypeScript Revealed”一书说
"You can iterate through the items in an array by using either for or for..in loops as demonstrated here:
“您可以使用 for 或 for..in 循环遍历数组中的项目,如下所示:
// standard for loop
for (var i = 0; i < actors.length; i++)
{
console.log(actors[i]);
}
// for..in loop
for (var actor in actors)
{
console.log(actor);
}
"
”
Turns out, the second loop does notpass the actors in the loop. So would say this is plain wrong. Sadly it is as above, loops are untouched by typescript.
事实证明,第二个循环没有传递循环中的演员。所以会说这是完全错误的。可悲的是,如上所述,打字稿未触及循环。
mapand forEachoften help me and are due to typescripts enhancements on function definitions more approachable, lke at the very moment:
map和forEach经常帮助我,并且由于打字稿对函数定义的增强更加平易近人,就像此刻:
this.notes = arr.map(state => new Note(state));
My wish list to TypeScript;
我对 TypeScript 的愿望清单;
- Generic collections
- Iterators (IEnumerable, IEnumerator interfaces would be best)
- 通用集合
- 迭代器(IEnumerable、IEnumerator 接口最好)