eclipse Spring IDE 插件与 STS：版本 3.3.0 的功能比较
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18227089/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Spring IDE plugin vs STS: feature comparison for version 3.3.0
提问by Taoufik Mohdit
Does anyone know where I can find the most recent feature comparison document for Spring IDE plugin vs SpringSource Tool Suite STS (version 3.3.0)?
有谁知道我在哪里可以找到 Spring IDE 插件与 SpringSource Tool Suite STS（3.3.0 版）的最新功能比较文档？
I believe Eclipse made some good progress in Kepler release, (for example Maven support being shipped in) so was wondering if the feature gap between Eclipse+Spring IDE plugin and STS highlighted in 2.9.2 Feature Comparisonwere reduced in Eclipse Java EE Kepler.
我相信 Eclipse 在 Kepler 版本中取得了一些不错的进展（例如，Maven 支持被提供）所以想知道 Eclipse + Spring IDE 插件和2.9.2 特性比较中突出显示的 STS 之间的特性差距是否在 Eclipse Java EE Kepler 中减少了。
回答by Andrew Eisenberg
There is not much difference now between Eclipse + Spring-IDE and STS. The main difference is that when you download STS, you are guaranteed that all the bits and pieces work together. When you install Eclipse + Spring-IDE, you may have some compatibility problems and trouble installing or upgrading.
现在 Eclipse + Spring-IDE 和 STS 之间没有太大区别。主要区别在于，当您下载 STS 时，可以保证所有的点点滴滴都能协同工作。安装Eclipse+Spring-IDE时，可能会遇到一些兼容性问题，安装升级麻烦。
My advice is this: if you already have an Eclipse that has custom plugins installed, then go with Eclipse + Spring-IDE and if you are starting from scratch, go with STS.
我的建议是：如果您已经有一个安装了自定义插件的 Eclipse，那么使用 Eclipse + Spring-IDE，如果您是从头开始，请使用 STS。
