macos 使用信号量的程序在 Linux 上运行良好......在 Mac osX 上出现意外结果

声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow 原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4136181/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me): StackOverFlow

提示:将鼠标放在中文语句上可以显示对应的英文。显示中英文
时间:2020-10-21 07:20:11  来源:igfitidea点击:

Program using Semaphores runs fine on Linux...unexpected results on Mac osX

cmacossynchronizationsemaphore

提问by Adam Soffer

I wrote a simple program solving the Readers-Writers problem using semaphores. It runs perfectly on Linux os, but when I run it on my Mac osX I get unexpected results and I can't figure out why.

我编写了一个使用信号量解决读者-作者问题的简单程序。它在 Linux 操作系统上运行完美,但是当我在 Mac osX 上运行它时,我得到了意想不到的结果,我不知道为什么。

My Program:

我的程序:

#include <semaphore.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <unistd.h>

void* function1(void* val);
void* function2(void* val);

// shared values
volatile int X;
volatile int Y;

// declare semaphores
sem_t s1;
sem_t s2;

main()
{
void* status;

pthread_t thread1;
pthread_t thread2;
srand(time(NULL));

// initialize semaphores to zero
sem_init(&s1, 0, 0);
sem_init(&s2, 0, 0);

pthread_create(&thread1, NULL, function1, NULL);
pthread_create(&thread2, NULL, function2, NULL);

pthread_join(thread1, &status);
pthread_join(thread2, &status);

sem_destroy(&s1);
sem_destroy(&s2);

}

void* function1(void* val)
{
   while(1)
   {
   X = rand()%1000; // write 
   printf("After thread ID A writes to X, X = %d\n", X);
   sem_post(&s1); // signal
   sem_wait(&s2); // wait
   printf("After thread ID A reads from Y, Y = %d\n", Y); // read
   sleep(3);
   }   
}

void* function2(void* val)
{
   while(1)
   {
    sem_wait(&s1); // wait
    printf("After thread ID B reads from X, X = %d\n", X); // read
    Y = rand()%1000; // write
    printf("After thread ID B write to Y, Y = %d\n", Y);
    sem_post(&s2); // signal
    sleep(3);
   }
}

The output I receive on Linux (what it's supposed to look like):

我在 Linux 上收到的输出(它应该是什么样子):

After thread ID A writes to X, X = 100
After thread ID B reads from X, X = 100
After thread ID B write to Y, Y = 234
After thread ID A reads from Y, Y = 234
...

The output on Mac osX (unexpected):

Mac osX 上的输出(意外):

After thread ID A writes to X, X = 253
After thread ID A reads from Y, Y = 0
After thread ID B reads from X, X = 253
After thread ID B write to Y, Y = 728
...

回答by David Gelhar

Check the error return on the sem_init calls; I bet you'll find the OS X version returning a "Function not implemented" error.

检查 sem_init 调用的错误返回;我敢打赌,您会发现 OS X 版本返回“功能未实现”错误。

This is because unnamed POSIX semaphores are not implemented on OS X. You need to use named semaphores, or pthread mutex/condition variables.

这是因为未在 OS X 上实现未命名的 POSIX 信号量。您需要使用命名信号量或 pthread 互斥量/条件变量。

回答by chad

Just for completeness, here's a working Mac OS X version using sem_open()and sem_unlink()instead of sem_init()and sem_destroy().

为了完整起见,这里有一个使用sem_open()andsem_unlink()代替sem_init()and 的Mac OS X 版本sem_destroy()

/*
cat semtest.c

source:
"Program using Semaphores runs fine on Linux...unexpected results on Mac osX",
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4136181/program-using-semaphores-runs-fine-on-linux-unexpected-results-on-mac-osx

compiled on Mac OS X 10.6.8 with:
gcc -ansi -pedantic -std=gnu99 -Os -Wall -Wextra -Wshadow -l pthread -o semtest semtest.c

./semtest

*/


#include <semaphore.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

void* function1();
void* function2();

// shared values
volatile int X;
volatile int Y;

// declare semaphores
//sem_t s1;
//sem_t s2;
sem_t *s1;
sem_t *s2;
static const char *semname1 = "Semaphore1";
static const char *semname2 = "Semaphore2";

int main(void)
{

   void* status;

   pthread_t thread1;
   pthread_t thread2;
   srand(time(NULL));

   /*
   // initialize semaphores to zero
   sem_init(&s1, 0, 0);
   sem_init(&s2, 0, 0);
   */

   s1 = sem_open(semname1, O_CREAT, 0777, 0);
   if (s1 == SEM_FAILED)
   {
      fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", "ERROR creating semaphore semname1");
      exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
   }

   s2 = sem_open(semname2, O_CREAT, 0777, 0);
   if (s2 == SEM_FAILED)
   {
      fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", "ERROR creating semaphore semname2");
      exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
   }


   pthread_create(&thread1, NULL, function1, NULL);
   pthread_create(&thread2, NULL, function2, NULL);

   pthread_join(thread1, &status);
   pthread_join(thread2, &status);

   //sem_destroy(&s1);
   //sem_destroy(&s2);
   sem_unlink(semname1);
   sem_unlink(semname2);

   return 0;

}

void* function1()
{
   while(1)
   {
   X = rand()%1000; // write 
   printf("After thread ID A writes to X, X = %d\n", X);
   //sem_post(&s1); // signal
   //sem_wait(&s2); // wait
   sem_post(s1); // signal
   sem_wait(s2); // wait
   printf("After thread ID A reads from Y, Y = %d\n", Y); // read
   sleep(3);
   }   
}

void* function2()
{
   while(1)
   {
    //sem_wait(&s1); // wait
    sem_wait(s1); // wait
    printf("After thread ID B reads from X, X = %d\n", X); // read
    Y = rand()%1000; // write
    printf("After thread ID B write to Y, Y = %d\n", Y);
    //sem_post(&s2); // signal
    sem_post(s2); // signal
    sleep(3);
   }
}