XAMPP（适用于 Windows）是否比 WampServer 更受欢迎？如果是这样，为什么？
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3247331/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Is XAMPP (for Windows) preferred over WampServer? If so, why?
提问by GreenMatt
It seems lots of answers to questions about getting started in web development include "install XAMPP", even when the platform is Windows. Meanwhile, WampServerdoesn't seem to be mentioned often. I've used both XAMPP and WampServer (admittedly, WampServer much more) and think they are both fine. So, is XAMPP preferred? If it is, why?
似乎很多关于 Web 开发入门问题的答案都包括“安装XAMPP”，即使平台是 Windows。同时，WampServer似乎并不经常被提及。我已经使用了 XAMPP 和 WampServer（诚然，WampServer 使用的更多）并且认为它们都很好。那么，XAMPP 是首选吗？如果是，为什么？
I realize that Perl comes with XAMPP, but this bias seems to exist even when PHP is the only programming language in question.
我意识到 Perl 带有 XAMPP，但即使 PHP 是唯一有问题的编程语言，这种偏见似乎也存在。
This questionseems related, but the answers don't really get to the core of why XAMPP seems preferred over WAMP. (And is also a bit stale.)
这个问题似乎相关，但答案并没有真正触及为什么 XAMPP 似乎比 WAMP 更受欢迎的核心。（而且也有点陈旧。）
Update (May 30, 2012):This article, points to more packages to try out. AMPSSwas the author's choice for ease of use and extensibility. However, one of the more specialized BitNami stacksmay be better for some situations. WampServer and XAMPP still got good marks.
更新（2012 年 5 月 30 日）：本文指向更多要试用的软件包。 AMPSS是作者选择的易用性和可扩展性。但是，在某些情况下，更专业的BitNami 堆栈之一可能会更好。WampServer 和 XAMPP 仍然获得了很好的评价。
回答by GreenMatt
While I appreciate the effort of those who answered, I have not seen something directly addressing the issue. Thus, I'll mention some thoughts I've had on the topic:
虽然我感谢回答者的努力，但我还没有看到直接解决这个问题的内容。因此，我将提及我对这个主题的一些想法：
- One possibility is that XAMPP is better known - or at least what people learned of first. While I heard of WampServer long before XAMPP, that may not be the most common experience.
- I believe that every time I've looked, XAMPP has had more recent versions of the included software.
- WampServer doesn't provide much more than Apache, MySQL, and PHP - just phpMyAdmin and SQLite, I believe. XAMPP provides phpMyAdmin, FileZilla FTP server, and Mercury Mail. Also, in spite of somewhat excluding this in the question, XAMPP includes Perl while Wampserver does not. So if Perl is needed/liked by the person making the recommendation, it seems likely that they will recommend XAMPP over WampServer.
- 一种可能性是 XAMPP 更为人所知——或者至少是人们首先了解到的。虽然我早在 XAMPP 之前就听说过 WampServer，但这可能不是最常见的体验。
- 我相信每次我查看时，XAMPP 都有包含软件的更新版本。
- WampServer 提供的不仅仅是 Apache、MySQL 和 PHP——我相信只有 phpMyAdmin 和 SQLite。XAMPP 提供 phpMyAdmin、FileZilla FTP 服务器和 Mercury Mail。此外，尽管在问题中有些排除了这一点，但 XAMPP 包含 Perl，而 Wampserver 不包含。因此，如果提出建议的人需要/喜欢 Perl，他们似乎会通过 WampServer 推荐 XAMPP。
回答by Peter Moberg
I like WampServer because it is easier to have different PHP/Mysql versions installed for different projects.
我喜欢 WampServer，因为它更容易为不同的项目安装不同的 PHP/Mysql 版本。
回答by amilaishere
I am using wamp server since long time. It's light weight and very easy to configure and do upgrades. Also If you need perl, you can simply install perl into wamp server. I also used xampp couple of times, but simply I don't like it. Also I heard it has some security vulnerabilities and need to reconfigure. Also it suggest to turn off UAC in windows (vista & seven). I think it wasn't good idea.
我很长时间以来一直在使用 wamp 服务器。它重量轻，非常容易配置和升级。另外如果你需要 perl，你可以简单地将 perl 安装到 wamp 服务器中。我也使用过 xampp 几次，但我不喜欢它。我也听说它有一些安全漏洞，需要重新配置。它还建议在 Windows (vista & 7) 中关闭 UAC。我认为这不是个好主意。
回答by Valentino Vranken
I stumbled upon your question when looking for an answer to "what WAMP package would be the most interesting". I recently formatted my PC and before the format I was running an older version of PHP, an older version of Apache, and an older version of MySQL. My wiki (Mediawiki - only used locally - don't ask :-) was running fine on that for several years.
在寻找“什么 WAMP 包最有趣”的答案时，我偶然发现了您的问题。我最近格式化了我的 PC，在格式化之前我运行的是旧版本的 PHP、旧版本的 Apache 和旧版本的 MySQL。我的维基（Mediawiki - 仅在本地使用 - 不要问:-) 多年来一直运行良好。
As I didn't want to waste too much time, I just wanted a WAMP package which I could quickly install, restore the DB, copy the site into the htdocs, and get it running.
因为我不想浪费太多时间，所以我只想要一个 WAMP 包，我可以快速安装、恢复数据库、将站点复制到 htdocs 并使其运行。
So I installed Wampserver. Installation went without any issues. Turned out that I needed some additional time upgrading the wiki to support the latest PHP version but even that finished successfully after more than an hour.
所以我安装了Wampserver。安装没有任何问题。结果证明我需要一些额外的时间来升级 wiki 以支持最新的 PHP 版本，但即使在一个多小时后也成功完成。
Obviously I can't compare different WAMP packages as I've only used one but my experience so far has not led me into thinking that I chose the wrong one.
显然我无法比较不同的 WAMP 软件包，因为我只使用过一个，但到目前为止我的经验并没有让我认为我选择了错误的一个。
