Java Hibernate - PropertyNotFoundException:找不到
声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/921239/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Hibernate - PropertyNotFoundException: Could not find a getter for
提问by Ben Noland
I have a class that looks like the following:
我有一个如下所示的类:
public class MyClass {
private String dPart1;
public String getDPart1() {
return dPart1;
}
public void setDPart1(String dPart1) {
this.dPart1 = dPart1;
}
}
My hibernate mapping file maps the property as follows:
我的休眠映射文件映射属性如下:
<property name="dPart1" not-null="true"/>
I get the following error:
我收到以下错误:
org.hibernate.PropertyNotFoundException: Could not find a getter for dPart1 in class com.mypackage.MyClass
at org.hibernate.property.BasicPropertyAccessor.createGetter(BasicPropertyAccessor.java:282)
at org.hibernate.property.BasicPropertyAccessor.getGetter(BasicPropertyAccessor.java:275)
at org.hibernate.mapping.Property.getGetter(Property.java:272)
at org.hibernate.tuple.entity.PojoEntityTuplizer.buildPropertyGetter(PojoEntityTuplizer.java:247)
at org.hibernate.tuple.entity.AbstractEntityTuplizer.<init>(AbstractEntityTuplizer.java:125)
at org.hibernate.tuple.entity.PojoEntityTuplizer.<init>(PojoEntityTuplizer.java:55)
at org.hibernate.tuple.entity.EntityEntityModeToTuplizerMapping.<init>(EntityEntityModeToTuplizerMapping.java:56)
at org.hibernate.tuple.entity.EntityMetamodel.<init>(EntityMetamodel.java:302)
at org.hibernate.persister.entity.AbstractEntityPersister.<init>(AbstractEntityPersister.java:434)
at
It appears that hibernate doesn't like my capitalization. How should I fix this?
看来 hibernate 不喜欢我的大写。我应该如何解决这个问题?
采纳答案by Fortega
<property name="DPart1" not-null="true"/>
should work...
应该管用...
回答by dfa
for a property called "dPart1" a hibernate will try a getter named "getDpart1" not "getDPart1" IIRC
对于名为“dPart1”的属性,休眠将尝试名为“getDpart1”而不是“getDPart1”IIRC的getter
回答by Rune Sundling
Can't you just access it like a field?
你不能像访问字段一样访问它吗?
access="field"
访问=“字段”
回答by Rune Sundling
I got the solution
我得到了解决方案
Please make dPart1 to dpart1 and change the getter and setter again..
请将 dPart1 设为 dpart1 并再次更改 getter 和 setter。
It is working for me now.
它现在对我有用。
Remember to change the xml also.
记住也要更改xml。
回答by JuserNt
private String rptausu;
public String getRptausu() {
return rptausu;
}
public void setRptausu(String rpta) {
rptausu = rpta;
}
mapping:
映射:
<property name="prtausu" />
works correctly
工作正常
回答by Mike Demenok
From what I've seen, Hibernate (at least version 3.2.4) will expect a property like dPart to have a getter named getdPart: d stays lowercase. Look at dfa's answer as well - I am guessing that other versions might expect getDpart instead.
从我所见,Hibernate(至少版本 3.2.4)会期望像 dPart 这样的属性有一个名为 getdPart 的 getter:d 保持小写。也看看 dfa 的答案 - 我猜其他版本可能会期望 getDpart 代替。
回答by Sayantan
The setter & getter should look like this
setter 和 getter 应该是这样的
getdPart1()
setdPart1(....)
That's how the setters & getters are generated if generated through an IDE like eclipse.
如果通过 Eclipse 之类的 IDE 生成,那么 setter 和 getter 就是这样生成的。
回答by Prasanna Kumar
For a property private Integer carId;
对于私有的 Integer carId 属性;
the setters and getters should be
setter 和 getter 应该是
getCarId() setCarId(Integer carId)
getCarId() setCarId(Integer carId)
回答by askinss
The naming convention of the property matters example in my own case I initially used
在我最初使用的我自己的案例中,属性的命名约定很重要
private String newimsi, getNewImsi();
the above failed with same exception
以上失败,但有同样的例外
propertynotfoundexception
属性未找到异常
until I corrected to below before it worked
直到我在它起作用之前更正到下面
getNewimsi();
回答by Piyush Upadhyay
Best Practice is not to create getters/setters by our self but use the Eclipse Shortcut(Alt+Shift+S) to create the same for the variables defined in a bean/pojo.
最佳实践不是我们自己创建 getter/setter,而是使用 Eclipse Shortcut(Alt+Shift+S) 为 bean/pojo 中定义的变量创建相同的变量。
Naming convention does matters.
命名约定很重要。