bash 列出 Linux 中组可写的文件和目录
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2373561/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Listing files and directories writable by the group in Linux
提问by pako
What's the easiest way to recursively list files in a given directory and its subdirectories, that are writable by the group which owns them? I'm using Debian 5.
在给定目录及其子目录中递归列出文件的最简单方法是什么，这些文件可由拥有它们的组写入？我正在使用 Debian 5。
回答by sorpigal
Something like
就像是
find /dir/ -perm /g=w
Or, for output like ls -l
或者，对于像 ls -l 这样的输出
find /dir/ -perm /g=w -exec ls -lLd {} +
回答by Segfault
find /dir/ -perm /0020is also a good solution. Check the man page for find. My version in Debian (find (GNU findutils) 4.4.0) has the argument by Sorpigal as deprecated.
find /dir/ -perm /0020也是一个很好的解决方案。检查手册页以查找。我在 Debian 中的版本（find (GNU findutils) 4.4.0）中 Sorpigal 的论点已被弃用。
-perm mode
File's permission bits are exactly mode (octal or symbolic).
Since an exact match is required, if you want to use this form
for symbolic modes, you may have to specify a rather complex
mode string. For example -perm g=w will only match files which
have mode 0020 (that is, ones for which group write permission
is the only permission set). It is more likely that you will
want to use the `/' or `-' forms, for example -perm -g=w, which
matches any file with group write permission. See the EXAMPLES
section for some illustrative examples.
-perm -mode
All of the permission bits mode are set for the file. Symbolic
modes are accepted in this form, and this is usually the way in
which would want to use them. You must specify `u', `g' or `o'
if you use a symbolic mode. See the EXAMPLES section for some
illustrative examples.
-perm /mode
Any of the permission bits mode are set for the file. Symbolic
modes are accepted in this form. You must specify `u', `g' or
`o' if you use a symbolic mode. See the EXAMPLES section for
some illustrative examples. If no permission bits in mode are
set, this test currently matches no files. However, it will
soon be changed to match any file (the idea is to be more con-
sistent with the behaviour of -perm -000).
-perm +mode
Deprecated, old way of searching for files with any of the per-
mission bits in mode set. You should use -perm /mode instead.
Trying to use the `+' syntax with symbolic modes will yield sur-
prising results. For example, `+u+x' is a valid symbolic mode
(equivalent to +u,+x, i.e. 0111) and will therefore not be eval-
uated as -perm +mode but instead as the exact mode specifier
-perm mode and so it matches files with exact permissions 0111
instead of files with any execute bit set. If you found this
paragraph confusing, you're not alone - just use -perm /mode.
This form of the -perm test is deprecated because the POSIX
specification requires the interpretation of a leading `+' as
being part of a symbolic mode, and so we switched to using `/'
instead.
