javascript 在线HTML/CSS/Javascript学习参考替代w3school？
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4662304/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Online HTML/CSS/Javascript learning reference alternative to w3schools?
提问by wajiw
From my time on SO I've found w3schools may not be the best place to send people as an html/web programming reference. I started using them a loooong time ago and have been sending people there for years because of their usage of programming categories and tutorials.
从那时起，我发现 w3schools 可能不是将人们作为 html/web 编程参考发送的最佳场所。我很久以前就开始使用它们，并且由于他们使用编程类别和教程，多年来一直派人去那里。
I know I can go there and easily find out what different tags are available for use(though it may not be correct) and I can find out attributes to tags easily. Are there any alternatives that can provide the same simple reference and tutorials as they do? Where should I refer people too?
我知道我可以去那里轻松找出可以使用的不同标签（尽管它可能不正确），并且我可以轻松找出标签的属性。是否有任何替代方案可以提供与它们相同的简单参考和教程？我应该在哪里推荐人？
采纳答案by bdukes
W3Fools - A W3Schools Interventionalso promotes the following "more reputable sources":
W3Fools - W3Schools 干预还促进了以下“更有信誉的来源”：
Opera Web Standards Curriculumcovers the basics of web standards-based design in HTML and CSS.
Google's HTML, CSS, and Javascript from the Ground Uppresents the basics of web development with video tutorials presented by Google's expert web developers.
SitePointis a pretty good reference for HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Their documentation always mentions feature support across different browsers, and describes known browser bugs.
The W3C, itself, has a wiki-based general Learnpage as well as an HTML element reference.
The MDN (Mozilla's Developer Network)takes over at intermediate CSS and covers JavaScript better than anyone.
The MDN is also a wiki (little known fact), which means we, as knowledgeable web developers, can add or change information so the pages are as effective and comprehensive as possible.
Opera Web 标准课程涵盖 HTML 和 CSS 中基于 Web 标准的设计的基础知识。
Google 的 HTML、CSS 和 Javascript 从头开始展示了 Web 开发的基础知识以及由 Google 的专业 Web 开发人员提供的视频教程。
SitePoint是 HTML、CSS 和 JavaScript 的一个很好的参考。他们的文档总是提到跨不同浏览器的功能支持，并描述了已知的浏览器错误。
W3C 本身有一个基于 wiki 的通用Learn页面以及一个HTML 元素参考。
MDN（Mozilla 的开发人员网络）接管了中级 CSS，并且比任何人都更好地涵盖了 JavaScript。
MDN 也是一个 wiki（鲜为人知的事实），这意味着作为知识渊博的 Web 开发人员，我们可以添加或更改信息，使页面尽可能有效和全面。
回答by lonesomeday
In general, my first stop for HTML, Javascript or DOM information is the MDC Doc Centerfrom the Mozilla Developer Network. It is occasionally Firefox/Gecko-specific, but is in general a good first stop.
一般来说，我获取 HTML、Javascript 或 DOM 信息的第一站是Mozilla 开发人员网络的MDC 文档中心。它偶尔是特定于 Firefox/Gecko 的，但通常是一个很好的第一站。
Personally, I find the HTML spec (and even more the DOM spec) far to hard to take in quickly or to use as a quick reference. MDC is great for that.
就我个人而言，我发现 HTML 规范（甚至更多是 DOM 规范）很难快速接受或用作快速参考。MDC 非常适合这一点。
回答by Ivan Arrizabalaga
There are too many good references out there, but these are my two cents. Hope it helps:
那里有太多好的参考资料，但这些是我的两分钱。希望能帮助到你：
Great tricks, references and examples: http://www.quirksmode.org/sitemap.html
Nice step by step: http://nearlythere.com/mite03/css-tutorial/
Cheat sheets (pretty cool!!): http://sixrevisions.com/resources/cheat_sheets_web_developer/
很棒的技巧、参考和示例：http: //www.quirksmode.org/sitemap.html
备忘单（非常酷！！）：http: //sixrevisions.com/resources/cheat_sheets_web_developer/
回答by zzzzBov
The very bestHTML reference is the HTML spec itself:
在最好的HTML参考是规范本身的HTML：
It provides examples of how elements/attributes can be used, and the expected reactions in many case situations.
它提供了如何使用元素/属性的示例，以及在许多情况下的预期反应。
回答by David
The first place you should probably send somebody for reference would be the most official body of reference for the subject. For example, if somebody was asking about a particular HTML tag or something about the HTML spec, their first stop should be that spec(as an example, and there are lots of page anchors throughout that spec to navigate directly to what the user needs).
您应该派人参考的第一个地方是该主题最官方的参考机构。例如，如果有人询问特定的 HTML 标签或 HTML 规范，他们的第一站应该是该规范（例如，整个规范中有很多页面锚点可以直接导航到用户需要的内容） .
Examples can often be quickly found via Google. If the Google results are clearly plentiful and seem pretty good, then just linking the user to the Google search itself would work fine. (And may subtly nudge them to use Google a little more thoroughly, though keep in mind that SO generally doesn't want its answers to just be "just Google it" so use tact and offer additional information beyond just the search.)
通常可以通过 Google 快速找到示例。如果谷歌搜索结果明显丰富并且看起来不错，那么只需将用户链接到谷歌搜索本身就可以正常工作。（并且可能会巧妙地推动他们更彻底地使用谷歌，但请记住，SO 通常不希望它的答案只是“谷歌它”，所以使用机智并提供搜索之外的其他信息。）
回答by The Nail
There is the W3C's Web Education Community Group Wiki, on standards that are maintained by them. It provides quite some useful information on e.g. HTML and CSS, and they link to appropriate standards.
W3C 的Web Education Community Group Wiki 提供了由他们维护的标准。它提供了一些非常有用的信息，例如 HTML 和 CSS，并且它们链接到适当的标准。
See for example this page on the textareaelement
例如，请参阅元素上的此页面textarea
EDIT:I just realize this was already mentioned as 'general Learn page' from the W3Fools page, but it might still be useful to name this reference.
编辑：我刚刚意识到这已经在 W3Fools 页面中被称为“通用学习页面”，但命名此参考可能仍然有用。
回答by Trufa
I love this one:
我喜欢这个：
I love the opera tutorial.(From there onwards).
我喜欢歌剧教程。（从那里开始）。
Concise but complete and very clearly explained!
简洁但完整，解释非常清楚！
回答by Mr Lister
Sites like Microsoft's MSDN and Mozilla's MDN are not bad, as long as you remember that they view the world through coloured glasses. The only real reference is, of course, the W3C.
Whenever some site's information clashes with the information on the W3C's site, the W3C is always right.
像微软的 MSDN 和 Mozilla 的 MDN 这样的网站也不错，只要你记得它们是通过有色眼镜看世界的。当然，唯一真正的参考是 W3C。
每当某个站点的信息与 W3C 站点上的信息发生冲突时，W3C 总是正确的。
Keep that in mind and you can safely peruse other websites, even W3Schools. W3Schools is not better or worse than other non-official websites.
记住这一点，您就可以安全地浏览其他网站，甚至 W3Schools。W3Schools 并不比其他非官方网站更好或更差。
