C#抽象类命名约定
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16857991/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
C# abstract class naming convention
提问by binard
In C#, the interface naming convention is I<myInterfaceName>(ex: IList).
在 C# 中，接口命名约定是I<myInterfaceName>（例如：）IList。
Are there any naming conventions for abstract classes?
抽象类是否有任何命名约定？
If there aren't, what are the main recommendations?
如果没有，主要的建议是什么？
回答by bpoiss
Normally, there is no suffix/prefixused when naming abstract classes, unlike interfaces, which have the prefix "I". Just give your class a name that describes what it is for, in a short precise way.
通常，在命名抽象类时不使用后缀/前缀，这与接口具有前缀“I”不同。只需为您的班级命名，以简短准确的方式描述其用途。
回答by jason
Are there a naming convention for abstract class ?
抽象类是否有命名约定？
No, there are no conventions here. There are some commonways of denoting an abstract base class. The most common I've seen is to use the suffix Base. Personally, I do not like this convention, and the Framework guidelinesrecommend against it.
不，这里没有约定。有一些表示抽象基类的常用方法。我见过的最常见的是使用后缀Base. 就我个人而言，我不喜欢这个约定，并且框架指南建议反对它。
And if there aren't what is the mains recommandations ?
如果没有什么是电源推荐？
A good, general name that describes what the class is modeling, just like any other class name. So Shapeand then Polygonand then RegularPolygonso on.
一个很好的通用名称，用于描述类正在建模的内容，就像任何其他类名称一样。因此，Shape然后Polygon再RegularPolygon等。
