C++ 为什么这会给出一个 Use of uninitialised value of size 8
声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7098253/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Why would this give a Use of uninitialised value of size 8
提问by Yotam
In my code I have a class named membrane
with a function named exciteMod()
, a function named decide()
and a variable named delta_U
. The first line of exciteMod()
is this->delta_U = 0
. In decide()
I have an exponent of -delta_U
(exp(-this->delta_U)
). which cause an error Use of uninitialised value of size 8. What might cause this? I don't have any error about delta_U
which is generated in valgrind.
在我的代码中,我有一个名为 的类membrane
,一个名为exciteMod()
的函数,一个名为 的函数decide()
和一个名为 的变量delta_U
。的第一行exciteMod()
是this->delta_U = 0
。在decide()
我有一个-delta_U
( exp(-this->delta_U)
)的指数。这会导致错误 使用大小为 8 的未初始化值。什么可能导致这种情况?我没有任何关于delta_U
valgrind 生成的错误。
Edit:Here are the relevant segment of the code:
编辑:这是代码的相关部分:
void membrane::exciteMod(){
this->delta_U = 0;
/* Do some stuff which does not directly affect this->delta_U*/
std::tr1::shared_ptr<bead> bit = this->beads.begin();
while (bit != this->nead.end()){
std::tr1::shared_ptr<bead> b = *bit++;
//calculate the doubles U and nextU on b, nothing here gives a warning in valgrind, anyhow U and nextU on b are always defined
this->delta_U += (b->nextU - b->U);
}
decide();
}
void membrane::decide(){
double r = P.r.ran3() // the random function from numerical recepies
double f = - this->delta_U;
if (r > exp(f)){ //this gives the warning even though delta_U is valid
/*stuff*/
}
}
This is the warning:
这是警告:
==467== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==467== at 0x300B00D75D: __ieee754_exp (in /lib64/libm-2.5.so)
==467== by 0x300B022FA3: exp (in /lib64/libm-2.5.so)
==467== by 0x40BB9A: membrane::decide() (membrane.cpp:813)
==467== by 0x40EBB1: membrane::exciteMod() (membrane.cpp:639)
==467== by 0x413994: membrane::MCstep(int) (membrane.cpp:486)
==467== by 0x402767: main (main.cpp:14)
==467==
在 0x300B00D75D 处使用大小为 8 的未初始化值==467==:__ieee754_exp(在 /lib64/libm-2.5.so 中)
==467== by 0x300B022FA3:exp(在 /lib64/libm-2.5.so 中)所以)
==467== by 0x40BB9A:membrane::decide() (membrane.cpp:813)
==467== by 0x40EBB1:membrane::exciteMod() (membrane.cpp:639)
==467== 0x413994:membrane::MCstep(int) (membrane.cpp:486)
==467== by 0x402767: main (main.cpp:14)
Edit:
I should have mentioned that the only place where I call decide()
is inside of exciteMod()
.
编辑:
我应该提到我打电话的唯一地方decide()
是exciteMod()
.
回答by Employed Russian
The most likely cause of uninitialized value is that at least one of b->nextU
or b->U
that you are adding to delta_U
is itself uninitialized. That is:
未初始化值的最可能原因是至少其中之一b->nextU
或b->U
您添加的delta_U
值本身未初始化。那是:
foo = 0;
foo += some_uninitialized_value;
if (foo) // Valgrind warns here
You would like Valgrind to report when foo becomes uninitialized. Unfortunately, doing so produces too many "false positive" warnings to be practical.
您希望 Valgrind 在 foo 未初始化时进行报告。不幸的是,这样做会产生太多的“误报”警告,不切实际。
You can insert into your loop calls to VALGRIND_CHECK_MEM_IS_DEFINED
(see Valgrind user manual), and Valgrind will signal the exact moment when delta_U
becomes undefined.
您可以插入到循环调用中VALGRIND_CHECK_MEM_IS_DEFINED
(请参阅Valgrind 用户手册),Valgrind 会在delta_U
未定义时发出确切的信号。
回答by Hemjal
lets say you have t number of values needed to be stored. then use this:
假设您需要存储 t 个值。然后使用这个:
int *p = (int *) malloc(t*(sizeof(int)+1));
memset(p,0,t*(sizeof(int)+1));