javascript React.js 2 路绑定:valueLink 中的两级深度路径

声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow 原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21057219/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me): StackOverFlow

提示:将鼠标放在中文语句上可以显示对应的英文。显示中英文
时间:2020-10-27 19:57:12  来源:igfitidea点击:

React.js 2-way bindings: two-levels deep path in valueLink

javascriptdata-bindingreactjs

提问by NVI

My state is:

我的状态是:

[
  {type: "translateX", x: 10},
  {type: "scaleX", x: 1.2}
]

I'm using Two-Way Binding Helpersand I can't provide a valid key string for linkState:

我正在使用双向绑定助手,但无法为以下各项提供有效的密钥字符串linkState

this.state.map(function(item, i) {
  return <div><input valueLink={this.linkState( ??? )}></div>
}

Would be nice if this.linkStateaccepted some query syntax, such as "0.type"to retrieve "translateX"from my example.

如果this.linkState接受一些查询语法会很好,例如从我的示例中"0.type"检索 "translateX"

Are there any workarounds?

有什么解决方法吗?



I wrote DeepLinkState mixinwhich is a drop-in replacement for React.addons.LinkedStateMixin. Usage example:

我写了DeepLinkState mixin,它是 React.addons.LinkedStateMixin 的直接替代品。用法示例:

this.state.map(function(item, i) {
  return <div><input valueLink={this.linkState([i, "x"])}></div>
}

linkState("0.x")is also acceptable syntax.

linkState("0.x")也是可接受的语法。

回答by tungd

Edit:

编辑:

I realized that deep-path for LinkedStateis pretty cool so I try to implement it.
The code: https://gist.github.com/tungd/8367229
Usage: http://jsfiddle.net/uHm6k/3/

我意识到 deep-path forLinkedState非常酷,所以我尝试实现它。
代码:https
: //gist.github.com/tungd/8367229用法:http: //jsfiddle.net/uHm6k/3/



As the document stated, LinkedStateis a wrapper around onChange/setStateand meant for simple case. You can always write the full onChange/setStateto achieve what you want. If you really want to stick with LinkedState, you can use the non mixin version, for example:

正如文档所述,LinkedState是一个包装器onChange/setState,用于简单的情况。你总是可以写完整的onChange/setState来实现你想要的。如果你真的想坚持使用LinkedState,你可以使用非 mixin 版本,例如:

getInitialState: function() {
    return { values: [
        { type: "translateX", x: 10 },
        { type: "scaleX", x: 1.2 }
    ]}
},
handleTypeChange: function(i, value) {
    this.state.values[i].type = value
    this.setState({ values: this.state.values })
},
render: function() {
    ...
    this.state.values.map(function(item, i) {
        var typeLink = {
            value: this.state.values[i].type,
            requestChange: this.handleTypeChange.bind(null, i)
        }
        return <div><input valueLink={typeLink}/></div>
    }, this)
    ...
}

Here is working JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/srbGL/

这是工作 JSFiddle:http: //jsfiddle.net/srbGL/

回答by gaperton

Here's the tutorial explaining how to handle things like this.

这是解释如何处理此类事情的教程。

State and Forms in React, Part 3: Handling the Complex State

React 中的状态和表单,第 3 部分:处理复杂状态

TL;DR:

特尔;博士:

0) Don't use standard links. Use these.

0) 不要使用标准链接。使用这些

1) Change your state to look like this:

1) 将您的状态更改为如下所示:

collection : [
  {type: "translateX", x: 10},
  {type: "scaleX", x: 1.2}
]

2) Take link to the collection:

2)获取链接到collection

var collectionLink = Link.state( this, 'collection' );

3) Iterate through the links to its elements:

3) 遍历指向其元素的链接:

collectionLink.map(function( itemLink, i ) {
  return <div><input valueLink={itemLink}></div>
})

回答by Sebastien Lorber

You can implement your own mixin if the base mixin doesn't satisfy you.

如果基本 mixin 不满足您,您可以实现自己的 mixin。

See how this mixin is implemented:

看看这个mixin是如何实现的:

var LinkedStateMixin = {
  /**
   * Create a ReactLink that's linked to part of this component's state. The
   * ReactLink will have the current value of this.state[key] and will call
   * setState() when a change is requested.
   *
   * @param {string} key state key to update. Note: you may want to use keyOf()
   * if you're using Google Closure Compiler advanced mode.
   * @return {ReactLink} ReactLink instance linking to the state.
   */
  linkState: function(key) {
    return new ReactLink(
      this.state[key],
      ReactStateSetters.createStateKeySetter(this, key)
    );
  }
};

/**
 * @param {*} value current value of the link
 * @param {function} requestChange callback to request a change
 */
function ReactLink(value, requestChange) {
  this.value = value;
  this.requestChange = requestChange;
}

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/fc73bf0a0abf739a9a8e6b1a5197dab113e76f27/src/addons/link/LinkedStateMixin.jshttps://github.com/facebook/react/blob/fc73bf0a0abf739a9a8e6b1a5197dab113e76f27/src/addons/link/ReactLink.js

https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/fc73bf0a0abf739a9a8e6b1a5197dab113e76f27/src/addons/link/LinkedStateMixin.js https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/fc73bf0a0abf7397a7a2fc73bf0a0abf7397a7a2d/fc73bf0a0abf7397a7a2f7397a7a2f7397a7a2a2f7397a7a2a2f739bf737a9a1a2f27/src/addons/link/LinkedStateMixin.js

So you can easily try to write your own linkStatefunction based on the above.

因此,您可以轻松地尝试linkState根据上述内容编写自己的函数。

linkState: function(key,key2) {
  return new ReactLink(
    this.state[key][key2],
    function(newValue) {
      this.state[key][key2] = newValue;
    }
  );
}

Notice that I didn't use the ReactStateSetters.createStateKeySetter(this, key). https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/fc73bf0a0abf739a9a8e6b1a5197dab113e76f27/src/core/ReactStateSetters.jsBy looking at the source code again you can find out this method doesn't do so much except it creates a function and does little caching optimizations:

请注意,我没有使用ReactStateSetters.createStateKeySetter(this, key). https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/fc73bf0a0abf739a9a8e6b1a5197dab113e76f27/src/core/ReactStateSetters.js通过再次查看源代码你会发现这个方法并没有做太多,除了它创建了一个函数并且做的很少缓存优化:

function createStateKeySetter(component, key) {
  // Partial state is allocated outside of the function closure so it can be
  // reused with every call, avoiding memory allocation when this function
  // is called.
  var partialState = {};
  return function stateKeySetter(value) {
    partialState[key] = value;
    component.setState(partialState);
  };
}

So you should definitely try to write your own mixin. This can be very useful if you have in your state a complex object and you want to modify it through the object API.

因此,您绝对应该尝试编写自己的 mixin。如果您的状态中有一个复杂的对象并且您想通过对象 API 修改它,这将非常有用。

回答by Dustin Getz

I do it without using value-link addon.

我没有使用价值链接插件。

Here is a demo: http://wingspan.github.io/wingspan-forms/examples/form-twins/

这是一个演示:http: //wingspan.github.io/wingspan-forms/examples/form-twins/

The secret sauce is to only define one onChange function:

秘诀是只定义一个 onChange 函数:

onChange: function (path, /* more paths,*/ value) {
    // clone the prior state
    // traverse the tree by the paths and assign the value
    this.setState(nextState);
}

use it like this:

像这样使用它:

<input 
    value={this.state['forms']['0']['firstName']} 
    onChange={_.partial(this.onChange, 'forms', '0', 'firstName')} />

If you have many (value, onChange)pairs that you have to pass around everywhere, it might make sense to define an abstraction around this similar to ReactLink, but I personally got pretty far without using ReactLink.

如果您有许多(value, onChange)必须在任何地方传递的对,那么围绕它定义一个类似于 ReactLink 的抽象可能是有意义的,但我个人在没有使用 ReactLink 的情况下已经走得很远了。

My colleagues and I recently open sourced wingspan-forms, a React library that helps with with deeply nested state. We leverage this approach heavily. You can see more example demos with linked state on the github page.

我和我的同事最近开源了wingspan-forms,这是一个有助于处理深度嵌套状态的React 库。我们大量利用这种方法。您可以在 github 页面上看到更多带有链接状态的示例演示。

回答by M?chael Makar?v

I wrote a blogpost about it: http://blog.sendsonar.com/2015/08/04/angular-like-deep-path-data-bindings-in-react/

我写了一篇关于它的博文:http: //blog.sendsonar.com/2015/08/04/angular-like-deep-path-data-bindings-in-react/

But basically I created a new component that would accept the 'state' of parent and a deep path, so you don't have to write extra code.

但基本上我创建了一个新组件,它可以接受父级的“状态”和深度路径,因此您不必编写额外的代码。

<MagicInput binding={[this, 'account.owner.email']} />

There's a JSFiddle too so you can play with it

还有一个 JSFiddle 所以你可以玩它

回答by mcmlxxxviii

I took a different approach which does not employ mixins and does not automatically mutate the state

我采用了一种不同的方法,它不使用 mixin 并且不会自动改变状态

See github.com/mcmlxxxviii/react-value-link

参见github.com/mcmlxxxviii/react-value-link