什么是最流行的通用 C++ 框架？
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2669771/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
What is the most popular general purpose C++ framework?
提问by Kyle Rozendo
I was looking at Qt and came to wondering, what is the most popular general purpose C++ framework, and what are some pros and cons of it?
我在看 Qt 并想知道什么是最流行的通用 C++ 框架，它有哪些优点和缺点？
回答by Hank Gay
回答by Stu Mackellar
Qtis very popular. It's available under open-source (LGPL) and commercial licenses, has fully-featured core and GUI class libraries and an integrated IDE and build system. It's also cross-platform.
Qt很受欢迎。它在开源 (LGPL) 和商业许可下可用，具有功能齐全的核心和 GUI 类库以及集成的 IDE 和构建系统。它也是跨平台的。
It's under very active development and has a new declarative UI library (QtQuickincluding QML) due in the next release (4.7).
它正在非常活跃的开发中，并且在下一个版本 (4.7) 中有一个新的声明式 UI 库（QtQuick包括QML）。
Definitely worth checking out for new projects.
绝对值得检查新项目。
For Windows-only work MFCis still worth a look. It's recently been updated.
对于仅适用于 Windows 的工作，MFC仍然值得一看。它最近被更新了。
回答by Clifford
The question as it stands is probably unanswerable; you'll probably end up with a list of people's interpretation of "framework" with no real way for distinguishing them.
目前的问题可能无法回答。您可能最终会得到一份人们对“框架”的解释列表，而没有真正区分它们的方法。
Perhaps we need a definition of framework? I suggest it is a library that in some way determines the architecture of an entire application. However that is perhaps a definition of "Application Framework", but if you mean the term more broadly, then the question is probably too broad. This definition however makes say Qt a framework, while Boost remains just a library. That makes Boost no more or less useful, so I really don't understand what you are trying to discover from the question.
也许我们需要一个框架的定义？我建议它是一个以某种方式决定整个应用程序架构的库。然而，这可能是“应用程序框架”的定义，但如果您的意思更广泛，那么这个问题可能太宽泛了。然而，这个定义使 Qt 成为一个框架，而 Boost 仍然只是一个库。这使得 Boost 或多或少有用，所以我真的不明白你想从这个问题中发现什么。
Here's a list of UI related libraries that mightbe considered "frameworks":
以下是可能被视为“框架”的 UI 相关库列表：
The most notable distinguishing feature is that some of them are cross-platform, and some are platform specific. Gnome is perhaps distinguished by having a C API (GTK+). .Net supports multiple languages, but requires C++/CLI rather than ISO C++ (but that is no worse than Qt's pre-processor IMO). MFC is a bit long in the tooth and not supported by free or third-party tools. TurboVision is antique and included for my amusement and geek nostalgia.
最显着的区别特征是其中一些是跨平台的，而一些是特定于平台的。Gnome 的特点可能是拥有 C API (GTK+)。.Net 支持多种语言，但需要 C++/CLI 而不是 ISO C++（但这并不比 Qt 的预处理器 IMO 差）。MFC 有点长，不受免费或第三方工具的支持。TurboVision 是古董，包含在我的娱乐和极客怀旧中。
回答by Stefano Altieri
I know this post is old but I found it very useful. I would like to add PoCo(POrtable COmponents) to the list
我知道这篇文章很旧，但我发现它非常有用。我想将PoCo（可移植组件）添加到列表中
I used it for seleral projects and includes a consistent and well designed framework for:
我将它用于 seleral 项目，并包含一个一致且设计良好的框架：
- XML
- Multi threading
- Networking
- Cryptography
- General purposes
- XML
- 多线程
- 联网
- 密码学
- 一般用途
It is also portable (I used it on Windows and Unix).
它也是可移植的（我在 Windows 和 Unix 上使用过它）。
