检查python类属性

声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow 原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4241171/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me): StackOverFlow

提示:将鼠标放在中文语句上可以显示对应的英文。显示中英文
时间:2020-08-18 14:54:20  来源:igfitidea点击:

Inspect python class attributes

pythonclassattributesintrospectioninspect

提问by Jakob Simon-Gaarde

I need a way to inspect a class so I can safely identify which attributes are user-defined class attributes. The problem is that functions like dir(), inspect.getmembers() and friends return all class attributes including the pre-defined ones like: __class__, __doc__, __dict__, __hash__. This is of course understandable, and one could argue that I could just make a list of named members to ignore, but unfortunately these pre-defined attributes are bound to change with different versions of Python therefore making my project volnerable to changed in the python project - and I don't like that.

我需要一种检查类的方法,以便我可以安全地识别哪些属性是用户定义的类属性。问题是像 dir()、inspect.getmembers() 和friends 之类的函数返回所有类属性,包括预定义的属性,例如:__class____doc____dict____hash__。这当然是可以理解的,有人可能会争辩说我可以只列出要忽略的命名成员列表,但不幸的是,这些预定义的属性必然会随着 Python 的不同版本而改变,因此使我的项目容易在 Python 项目中发生变化- 我不喜欢那样。

example:

例子:

>>> class A:
...   a=10
...   b=20
...   def __init__(self):
...     self.c=30
>>> dir(A)
['__doc__', '__init__', '__module__', 'a', 'b']
>>> get_user_attributes(A)
['a','b']

In the example above I want a safe way to retrieve only the user-defined class attributes ['a','b'] not 'c' as it is an instance attribute. So my question is... Can anyone help me with the above fictive function get_user_attributes(cls)?

在上面的示例中,我想要一种安全的方法来仅检索用户定义的类属性 ['a','b'] 而不是 'c',因为它是一个实例属性。所以我的问题是......任何人都可以帮助我完成上述虚构功能get_user_attributes(cls)吗?

P.S. I have spent some time trying to solve the problem by parsing the class in AST level which would be very easy. But I can't find a way to convert already parsed objects to an AST node tree. I guess all AST info is discarded once a class has been compiled into bytecode.

PS 我花了一些时间试图通过解析 AST 级别的类来解决这个问题,这很容易。但是我找不到将已经解析的对象转换为 AST 节点树的方法。我猜一旦一个类被编译成字节码,所有的 AST 信息都会被丢弃。

Best regards Jakob

最好的问候雅各布

采纳答案by aaronasterling

Below is the hard way. Here's the easy way. Don't know why it didn't occur to me sooner.

下面是艰难的方法。这是简单的方法。不知道为什么我没有早点想到。

import inspect

def get_user_attributes(cls):
    boring = dir(type('dummy', (object,), {}))
    return [item
            for item in inspect.getmembers(cls)
            if item[0] not in boring]


Here's a start

这是一个开始

def get_user_attributes(cls):
    boring = dir(type('dummy', (object,), {}))
    attrs = {}
    bases = reversed(inspect.getmro(cls))   
    for base in bases:
        if hasattr(base, '__dict__'):
            attrs.update(base.__dict__)
        elif hasattr(base, '__slots__'):
            if hasattr(base, base.__slots__[0]): 
                # We're dealing with a non-string sequence or one char string
                for item in base.__slots__:
                    attrs[item] = getattr(base, item)
            else: 
                # We're dealing with a single identifier as a string
                attrs[base.__slots__] = getattr(base, base.__slots__)
    for key in boring:
        del attrs['key']  # we can be sure it will be present so no need to guard this
    return attrs

This should be fairly robust. Essentially, it works by getting the attributes that are on a default subclass of objectto ignore. It then gets the mro of the class that's passed to it and traverses it in reverse order so that subclass keys can overwrite superclass keys. It returns a dictionary of key-value pairs. If you want a list of key, value tuples like in inspect.getmembersthen just return either attrs.items()or list(attrs.items())in Python 3.

这应该是相当健壮的。本质上,它的工作原理是获取object要忽略的默认子类上的属性。然后它获取传递给它的类的 mro 并以相反的顺序遍历它,以便子类键可以覆盖超类键。它返回一个键值对字典。如果你想键列表,值元像inspect.getmembers那么就返回要么attrs.items()list(attrs.items())Python 3中。

If you don't actually want to traverse the mro and just want attributes defined directly on the subclass then it's easier:

如果您实际上不想遍历 mro 并且只想直接在子类上定义属性,那么它会更容易:

def get_user_attributes(cls):
    boring = dir(type('dummy', (object,), {}))
    if hasattr(cls, '__dict__'):
        attrs = cls.__dict__.copy()
    elif hasattr(cls, '__slots__'):
        if hasattr(base, base.__slots__[0]): 
            # We're dealing with a non-string sequence or one char string
            for item in base.__slots__:
                attrs[item] = getattr(base, item)
            else: 
                # We're dealing with a single identifier as a string
                attrs[base.__slots__] = getattr(base, base.__slots__)
    for key in boring:
        del attrs['key']  # we can be sure it will be present so no need to guard this
    return attrs

回答by nate c

Double underscores on both ends of 'special attributes' have been a part of python before 2.0. It would be very unlikely that they would change that any time in the near future.

“特殊属性”两端的双下划线在 2.0 之前是 python 的一部分。他们不太可能在不久的将来改变这种情况。

class Foo(object):
  a = 1
  b = 2

def get_attrs(klass):
  return [k for k in klass.__dict__.keys()
            if not k.startswith('__')
            and not k.endswith('__')]

print get_attrs(Foo)

['a', 'b']

['a', 'b']

回答by Thomas K

If you use new style classes, could you simply subtract the attributes of the parent class?

如果使用新的样式类,是否可以简单地减去父类的属性?

class A(object):
    a = 10
    b = 20
    #...

def get_attrs(Foo):
    return [k for k in dir(Foo) if k not in dir(super(Foo))]

Edit:Not quite. __dict__,__module__and __weakref__appear when inheriting from object, but aren't there in object itself. You could special case these--I doubt they'd change very often.

编辑:不完全是。__dict__,__module__并且__weakref__在从 object 继承时出现,但在 object 本身中不存在。你可以对这些进行特殊处理——我怀疑它们会经常改变。

回答by Jakob Simon-Gaarde

Thanks aaronasterling, you gave me the expression i needed :-) My final class attribute inspector function looks like this:

谢谢 aaronasterling,你给了我我需要的表达式 :-) 我的最终类属性检查器函数如下所示:

def get_user_attributes(cls,exclude_methods=True):
  base_attrs = dir(type('dummy', (object,), {}))
  this_cls_attrs = dir(cls)
  res = []
  for attr in this_cls_attrs:
    if base_attrs.count(attr) or (callable(getattr(cls,attr)) and exclude_methods):
      continue
    res += [attr]
  return res

Either return class attribute variabels only (exclude_methods=True) or also retrieve the methods. My initial tests og the above function supports both old and new-style python classes.

仅返回类属性变量(exclude_methods=True)或检索方法。我的初始测试 og 上面的函数支持旧式和新式 python 类。

/ Jakob

/ 雅各布

回答by Hoi Wong

Sorry for necro-bumping the thread. I'm surprised that there's still no simple function (or a library) to handle such common usage as of 2019.

对不起,我死伤了线程。令我惊讶的是,截至 2019 年,仍然没有简单的函数(或库)来处理这种常见用法。

I'd like to thank aaronasterling for the idea. Actually, setcontainer provides a more straightforward way to express it:

我要感谢 aaronasterling 的想法。实际上,set容器提供了一种更直接的表达方式:

class dummy:    pass

def abridged_set_of_user_attributes(obj):
    return set(dir(obj))-set(dir(dummy))

def abridged_list_of_user_attributes(obj):
    return list(abridged_set_of_user_attributes(obj))

The original solution using list comprehension is actually two level of loops because there are two inkeyword compounded, despite having only one forkeyword made it look like less work than it is.

使用列表理解的原始解决方案实际上是两个级别的循环,因为有两个in关键字复合,尽管只有一个for关键字使它看起来比实际工作少。