Java 泛型、数组和 ClassCastException

声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow 原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/372250/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me): StackOverFlow

提示:将鼠标放在中文语句上可以显示对应的英文。显示中英文
时间:2020-08-11 13:58:26  来源:igfitidea点击:

Generics, arrays, and the ClassCastException

javaarraysgenericsclasscastexception

提问by ntownsend

I think there must be something subtle going on here that I don't know about. Consider the following:

我认为这里一定有一些我不知道的微妙之处。考虑以下:

public class Foo<T> {
  private T[] a = (T[]) new Object[5];

  public Foo() {
    // Add some elements to a
  }

  public T[] getA() {
    return a;
  }
}

Suppose that your main method contains the following:

假设您的主要方法包含以下内容:

Foo<Double> f = new Foo<Double>();
Double[] d = f.getA();

You will get a CastClassExceptionwith the message java.lang.Objectcannot be cast to java.lang.Double.

您将收到CastClassException消息java.lang.Object无法转换为java.lang.Double

Can anyone tell me why? My understanding of ClassCastExceptionis that it is thrown when you try to cast an object to a type that cannot be casted. That is, to a subclass of which it is not an instance (to quote the documentation). e.g.:

谁能告诉我为什么?我的理解ClassCastException是当您尝试将对象强制转换为无法强制转换的类型时会抛出它。也就是说,对于它不是实例的子类(引用文档)。例如:

Object o = new Double(3.);
Double d = (Double) o; // Working cast
String s = (String) o; // ClassCastException

And it seems I can do this. If awas just a Tinstead of an array T[], we can get aand cast it without a problem. Why do arrays break this?

而我似乎可以做到这一点。如果a只是一个T而不是数组T[],我们可以a毫无问题地获取和转换它。为什么数组会破坏这个?

Thanks.

谢谢。

采纳答案by matt b

Foo<Double> f = new Foo<Double>();

When you use this version of the generic class Foo, then for the member variable a, the compiler is essentially taking this line:

当您使用这个版本的泛型类 Foo 时,对于成员变量a,编译器本质上是采用这一行:

private T[] a = (T[]) new Object[5];

and replacing Twith Doubleto get this:

和更换TDouble得到这个:

private Double[] a = (Double[]) new Object[5];

You cannot cast from Object to Double, hence the ClassCastException.

您不能从 Object 转换为 Double,因此 ClassCastException。

Update and Clarification:Actually, after running some test code, the ClassCastException is more subtle than this. For example, this main method will work fine without any exception:

更新和澄清:实际上,在运行一些测试代码后,ClassCastException 比这更微妙。例如,这个 main 方法可以正常工作,没有任何异常:

public static void main(String[] args) {
    Foo<Double> f = new Foo<Double>();
    System.out.println(f.getA());
}

The problem occurs when you attempt to assign f.getA()to a reference of type Double[]:

当您尝试分配f.getA()给类型的引用时会出现问题Double[]

public static void main(String[] args) {
    Foo<Double> f = new Foo<Double>();
    Double[] a2 = f.getA(); // throws ClassCastException
    System.out.println(a2);
}

This is because the type-information about the member variable ais erased at runtime. Generics only provide type-safety at compile-time(I was somehow ignoring this in my initial post). So the problem is not

这是因为a在运行时删除了有关成员变量的类型信息。泛型只在编译时提供类型安全(我在最初的帖子中以某种方式忽略了这一点)。所以问题不是

private T[] a = (T[]) new Object[5];

because at run-time this code is really

因为在运行时这段代码真的是

private Object[] a = new Object[5];

The problem occurs when the result of method getA(), which at runtime actually returns an Object[], is assigned to a reference of type Double[]- this statement throws the ClassCastException because Object cannot be cast to Double.

当方法的结果(getA()在运行时实际上返回Object[])被分配给类型的引用时会出现问题Double[]- 此语句抛出 ClassCastException 因为 Object 无法转换为 Double。

Update 2: to answer your final question "why do arrays break this?" The answer is because the language specification does not support generic array creation. See this forum post for more- in order to be backwards compatible, nothing is known about the type of T at runtime.

更新 2:回答你的最后一个问题“为什么数组会破坏这个?” 答案是因为语言规范不支持泛型数组创建。有关更多信息,请参阅此论坛帖子- 为了向后兼容,在运行时对 T 的类型一无所知。

回答by ntownsend

@matt b: Thanks for the answer! Very helpful.

@matt b:感谢您的回答!很有帮助。

I have found a workaround for those interested: give the getA method an initialized array to populate. That way the type info is available.

我为那些感兴趣的人找到了一个解决方法:给 getA 方法一个初始化的数组来填充。这样类型信息就可用了。

public class Foo<T> {
  private T[] a = (T[]) new Object[5];

  public Foo() {
    // Add some elements to a
  }

  public T[] getA(T[] holdA) {
    // Check whether holdA is null and handle it...then:
    holdA = (T[]) Array.newInstance(holdA.getClass().getComponentType(), a.length);
    System.arraycopy(a, 0, holdA, 0, a.length);
    return holdA;
  }
}

Then for your main method:

然后对于您的主要方法:

public static void main(String[] args) {
  Foo<Double> f = new Foo<Double>();
  Double[] a2 = new Double[1];
  a2 = f.getA(a2);
}

回答by Miserable Variable

There may be some small errors in @mattb's explanation.

@mattb 的解释中可能有一些小错误。

The error is not

错误不是

java.lang.Object cannot be cast to java.lang.Double.

java.lang.Object 不能转换为 java.lang.Double。

It is:

这是:

[Ljava.lang.Object; cannot be cast to [Ljava.lang.Double

[Ljava.lang.Object; 不能转换为 [Ljava.lang.Double

The [L means an array. That is, the error is that an arrayof Objects cannot be cast to an array of Double. This is the same case as following:

[L 表示数组。也就是说,错误是一个阵列的对象不能被转换为双阵列。这与以下情况相同:

Object[] oarr = new Object[10];
Double[] darr = (Double[]) oarr;

This is obviously not allowed.

这显然是不允许的。

For your issue of creating typesafe arrays, another alternative is to except a class object in init and use Array.newInstance:

对于创建类型安全数组的问题,另一种选择是在 init 中排除类对象并使用 Array.newInstance:

import java.lang.reflect.Array;

class Foo<T> {
  private T[] a ;

  public Foo(Class<T> tclass) {
    a = (T[]) Array.newInstance(tclass, 5);
  }

  public T[] getA() {
    return a;
  }

  public static <T> Foo<T> create(Class<T> tclass) {
    return new Foo<T>(tclass);
  }
}

class Array1
{
  public static final void main(final String[] args) {
    Foo<Double> f = Foo.create(Double.class);
    Double[] d = f.getA();
  }


}