vba VBA中的编辑距离

声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow 原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4243036/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me): StackOverFlow

提示:将鼠标放在中文语句上可以显示对应的英文。显示中英文
时间:2020-09-08 10:57:22  来源:igfitidea点击:

Levenshtein Distance in VBA

excelvbaexcel-vbalevenshtein-distance

提问by Yousf

I have excel sheet with data which I want to get Levenshtein Distance between them. I already tried to export as text, read in from script (php), run Levenshtein (calculate Levenshtein Distance), save it to excel again.

我有一个包含数据的 excel 表,我想在它们之间获得 Levenshtein 距离。我已经尝试导出为文本,从脚本(php)中读取,运行 Levenshtein(计算 Levenshtein 距离),再次将其保存到 excel。

But I am looking for a way to programatically calculate a Levenshtein Distance in VBA. How would I go about doing so?

但我正在寻找一种在 VBA 中以编程方式计算 Levenshtein 距离的方法。我该怎么做?

回答by smirkingman

Translated from Wikipedia:

翻译自维基百科

Option Explicit
Public Function Levenshtein(s1 As String, s2 As String)

Dim i As Integer
Dim j As Integer
Dim l1 As Integer
Dim l2 As Integer
Dim d() As Integer
Dim min1 As Integer
Dim min2 As Integer

l1 = Len(s1)
l2 = Len(s2)
ReDim d(l1, l2)
For i = 0 To l1
    d(i, 0) = i
Next
For j = 0 To l2
    d(0, j) = j
Next
For i = 1 To l1
    For j = 1 To l2
        If Mid(s1, i, 1) = Mid(s2, j, 1) Then
            d(i, j) = d(i - 1, j - 1)
        Else
            min1 = d(i - 1, j) + 1
            min2 = d(i, j - 1) + 1
            If min2 < min1 Then
                min1 = min2
            End If
            min2 = d(i - 1, j - 1) + 1
            If min2 < min1 Then
                min1 = min2
            End If
            d(i, j) = min1
        End If
    Next
Next
Levenshtein = d(l1, l2)
End Function

?Levenshtein("saturday","sunday")

?Levenshtein("星期六","星期日")

3

3

回答by aevanko

Thanks to smirkingman for the nice code post. Here is an optimized version.

感谢 smirkingman 提供了很好的代码帖子。这是一个优化的版本。

1) Use Asc(Mid$(s1, i, 1) instead. Numerical comparision is generally faster than text.

1) 使用 Asc(Mid$(s1, i, 1) 代替,数值比较一般比文本快。

2) Use Mid$ istead of Mid since the later is the variant ver. and adding $ is string ver.

2) 使用 Mid$ 而不是 Mid,因为后者是变体版本。并添加 $ 是字符串版本。

3) Use application function for min. (personal preference only)

3)使用应用程序功能分钟。(仅限个人喜好)

4) Use Long instead of Integers since it's what excel natively uses.

4)使用Long而不是Integers,因为它是excel本机使用的。

Function Levenshtein(ByVal string1 As String, ByVal string2 As String) As Long

Dim i As Long, j As Long
Dim string1_length As Long
Dim string2_length As Long
Dim distance() As Long

string1_length = Len(string1)
string2_length = Len(string2)
ReDim distance(string1_length, string2_length)

For i = 0 To string1_length
    distance(i, 0) = i
Next

For j = 0 To string2_length
    distance(0, j) = j
Next

For i = 1 To string1_length
    For j = 1 To string2_length
        If Asc(Mid$(string1, i, 1)) = Asc(Mid$(string2, j, 1)) Then
            distance(i, j) = distance(i - 1, j - 1)
        Else
            distance(i, j) = Application.WorksheetFunction.Min _
            (distance(i - 1, j) + 1, _
             distance(i, j - 1) + 1, _
             distance(i - 1, j - 1) + 1)
        End If
    Next
Next

Levenshtein = distance(string1_length, string2_length)

End Function

UPDATE:

更新

For those who want it: I think it's safe to say that most people use Levenshtein distance to calculate fuzzy match percentages. Here's a way to do that, and I have added an optimization that you can specify the min. match % to return (default is 70%+. You enter percentags like "50" or "80", or "0" to run the formula regardless).

对于那些想要它的人:我认为可以肯定地说,大多数人使用 Levenshtein 距离来计算模糊匹配百分比。这是一种方法,我添加了一个优化,您可以指定最小值。匹配 % 以返回(默认为 70%+。您输入百分比,如“50”或“80”,或“0”以运行公式,无论如何)。

The speed boost comes from the fact that the function will check if it's even possible that it's within the percentage you give it by checking the length of the 2 strings. Please note there are some areas where this function can be optimized, but I have kept it at this for the sake of readability. I concatenated the distance in result for proof of functionality, but you can fiddle with it :)

速度提升来自这样一个事实,即该函数将通过检查 2 个字符串的长度来检查它是否可能在您给出的百分比范围内。请注意,有一些地方可以优化此功能,但为了便于阅读,我将其保留在此。我将结果中的距离连接起来以证明功能,但您可以摆弄它:)

Function FuzzyMatch(ByVal string1 As String, _
                    ByVal string2 As String, _
                    Optional min_percentage As Long = 70) As String

Dim i As Long, j As Long
Dim string1_length As Long
Dim string2_length As Long
Dim distance() As Long, result As Long

string1_length = Len(string1)
string2_length = Len(string2)

' Check if not too long
If string1_length >= string2_length * (min_percentage / 100) Then
    ' Check if not too short
    If string1_length <= string2_length * ((200 - min_percentage) / 100) Then

        ReDim distance(string1_length, string2_length)
        For i = 0 To string1_length: distance(i, 0) = i: Next
        For j = 0 To string2_length: distance(0, j) = j: Next

        For i = 1 To string1_length
            For j = 1 To string2_length
                If Asc(Mid$(string1, i, 1)) = Asc(Mid$(string2, j, 1)) Then
                    distance(i, j) = distance(i - 1, j - 1)
                Else
                    distance(i, j) = Application.WorksheetFunction.Min _
                    (distance(i - 1, j) + 1, _
                     distance(i, j - 1) + 1, _
                     distance(i - 1, j - 1) + 1)
                End If
            Next
        Next
        result = distance(string1_length, string2_length) 'The distance
    End If
End If

If result <> 0 Then
    FuzzyMatch = (CLng((100 - ((result / string1_length) * 100)))) & _
                 "% (" & result & ")" 'Convert to percentage
Else
    FuzzyMatch = "Not a match"
End If

End Function

回答by Patrick OBeirne

Use a byte array for 17x speed gain

使用字节数组获得 17 倍的速度增益

  Option Explicit

  Public Declare Function GetTickCount Lib "kernel32" () As Long

  Sub test()
  Dim s1 As String, s2 As String, lTime As Long, i As Long
  s1 = Space(100)
  s2 = String(100, "a")
  lTime = GetTickCount
  For i = 1 To 100
     LevenshteinStrings s1, s2  ' the original fn from Wikibooks and Stackoverflow
  Next
  Debug.Print GetTickCount - lTime; " ms" '  3900  ms for all diff

  lTime = GetTickCount
  For i = 1 To 100
     Levenshtein s1, s2
  Next
  Debug.Print GetTickCount - lTime; " ms" ' 234  ms

  End Sub

  'Option Base 0 assumed

  'POB: fn with byte array is 17 times faster
  Function Levenshtein(ByVal string1 As String, ByVal string2 As String) As Long

  Dim i As Long, j As Long, bs1() As Byte, bs2() As Byte
  Dim string1_length As Long
  Dim string2_length As Long
  Dim distance() As Long
  Dim min1 As Long, min2 As Long, min3 As Long

  string1_length = Len(string1)
  string2_length = Len(string2)
  ReDim distance(string1_length, string2_length)
  bs1 = string1
  bs2 = string2

  For i = 0 To string1_length
      distance(i, 0) = i
  Next

  For j = 0 To string2_length
      distance(0, j) = j
  Next

  For i = 1 To string1_length
      For j = 1 To string2_length
          'slow way: If Mid$(string1, i, 1) = Mid$(string2, j, 1) Then
          If bs1((i - 1) * 2) = bs2((j - 1) * 2) Then   ' *2 because Unicode every 2nd byte is 0
              distance(i, j) = distance(i - 1, j - 1)
          Else
              'distance(i, j) = Application.WorksheetFunction.Min _
              (distance(i - 1, j) + 1, _
               distance(i, j - 1) + 1, _
               distance(i - 1, j - 1) + 1)
              ' spell it out, 50 times faster than worksheetfunction.min
              min1 = distance(i - 1, j) + 1
              min2 = distance(i, j - 1) + 1
              min3 = distance(i - 1, j - 1) + 1
              If min1 <= min2 And min1 <= min3 Then
                  distance(i, j) = min1
              ElseIf min2 <= min1 And min2 <= min3 Then
                  distance(i, j) = min2
              Else
                  distance(i, j) = min3
              End If

          End If
      Next
  Next

  Levenshtein = distance(string1_length, string2_length)

  End Function

回答by Apostolos55

I think it got even faster... Didn't do much other than improve previous code for speed and results as %

我认为它变得更快了......除了改进以前的代码以提高速度和结果为 % 之外没有做太多事情

' Levenshtein3 tweaked for UTLIMATE speed and CORRECT results
' Solution based on Longs
' Intermediate arrays holding Asc()make difference
' even Fixed length Arrays have impact on speed (small indeed)
' Levenshtein version 3 will return correct percentage
'
Function Levenshtein3(ByVal string1 As String, ByVal string2 As String) As Long

Dim i As Long, j As Long, string1_length As Long, string2_length As Long
Dim distance(0 To 60, 0 To 50) As Long, smStr1(1 To 60) As Long, smStr2(1 To 50) As Long
Dim min1 As Long, min2 As Long, min3 As Long, minmin As Long, MaxL As Long

string1_length = Len(string1):  string2_length = Len(string2)

distance(0, 0) = 0
For i = 1 To string1_length:    distance(i, 0) = i: smStr1(i) = Asc(LCase(Mid$(string1, i, 1))): Next
For j = 1 To string2_length:    distance(0, j) = j: smStr2(j) = Asc(LCase(Mid$(string2, j, 1))): Next
For i = 1 To string1_length
    For j = 1 To string2_length
        If smStr1(i) = smStr2(j) Then
            distance(i, j) = distance(i - 1, j - 1)
        Else
            min1 = distance(i - 1, j) + 1
            min2 = distance(i, j - 1) + 1
            min3 = distance(i - 1, j - 1) + 1
            If min2 < min1 Then
                If min2 < min3 Then minmin = min2 Else minmin = min3
            Else
                If min1 < min3 Then minmin = min1 Else minmin = min3
            End If
            distance(i, j) = minmin
        End If
    Next
Next

' Levenshtein3 will properly return a percent match (100%=exact) based on similarities and Lengths etc...
MaxL = string1_length: If string2_length > MaxL Then MaxL = string2_length
Levenshtein3 = 100 - CLng((distance(string1_length, string2_length) * 100) / MaxL)

End Function