C++ 什么时候需要“typename”关键字?
声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7923369/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
When is the "typename" keyword necessary?
提问by Martin
Possible Duplicate:
Officially, what is typename for?
Where and why do I have to put the template and typename keywords?
consider the code below:
考虑下面的代码:
template<class K>
class C {
struct P {};
vector<P> vec;
void f();
};
template<class K> void C<K>::f() {
typename vector<P>::iterator p = vec.begin();
}
Why is the "typename" keyword necessary in this example? Are there any other cases where "typename" must be specified?
为什么在这个例子中需要“typename”关键字?还有其他必须指定“typename”的情况吗?
回答by Kerrek SB
Short answer: Whenever referring to a nested name that is a dependent name, i.e. nested inside a template instance with unknown parameter.
简短回答:每当引用作为依赖名称的嵌套名称时,即嵌套在具有未知参数的模板实例中。
Long answer: There are three tiers of entities in C++: values, types, and templates. All of those can have names, and the name alone doesn't tell you which tier of entity it is. Rather, the information about the nature of a name's entity must be inferred from the context.
长答案:C++ 中有三层实体:值、类型和模板。所有这些都可以有名称,而仅凭名称并不能告诉您它是实体的哪一层。相反,必须从上下文中推断出有关名称实体性质的信息。
Whenever this inference is impossible, you have to specify it:
每当此推理不可能时,您必须指定它:
template <typename> struct Magic; // defined somewhere else
template <typename T> struct A
{
static const int value = Magic<T>::gnarl; // assumed "value"
typedef typename Magic<T>::brugh my_type; // decreed "type"
// ^^^^^^^^
void foo() {
Magic<T>::template kwpq<T>(1, 'a', .5); // decreed "template"
// ^^^^^^^^
}
};
Here the names Magic<T>::gnarl
, Magic<T>::brugh
and Magic<T>::kwpq
had to be expliciated, because it is impossible to tell: Since Magic
is a template, the very natureof the type Magic<T>
depends on T
-- there may be specializations which are entirely different from the primary template, for example.
此处的名称Magic<T>::gnarl
, Magic<T>::brugh
andMagic<T>::kwpq
必须加以说明,因为无法判断: 因为Magic
是模板,所以类型的本质Magic<T>
取决于T
——例如,可能存在与主模板完全不同的特化。
What makes Magic<T>::gnarl
a dependent name is the fact that we're inside a template definition, where T
is unknown. Had we used Magic<int>
, this would be different, since the compiler knows (you promise!) the full definition of Magic<int>
.
产生Magic<T>::gnarl
依赖名称的原因是我们在模板定义中,其中的位置T
是未知的。如果我们使用Magic<int>
,情况会有所不同,因为编译器知道(你保证!) 的完整定义Magic<int>
。
(If you want to test this yourself, here's a sample definition of Magic
that you can use. Pardon the use of constexpr
in the specializaation for brevity; if you have an old compiler, feel free to change the static member constant declaration to the old-style pre-C++11 form.)
(如果你想自己测试这个,这里有一个Magic
你可以使用的示例定义。constexpr
为了简洁,请原谅在专业化中使用C++11 之前的形式。)
template <typename T> struct Magic
{
static const T gnarl;
typedef T & brugh;
template <typename S> static void kwpq(int, char, double) { T x; }
};
template <> struct Magic<signed char>
{
// note that `gnarl` is absent
static constexpr long double brugh = 0.25; // `brugh` is now a value
template <typename S> static int kwpq(int a, int b) { return a + b; }
};
Usage:
用法:
int main()
{
A<int> a;
a.foo();
return Magic<signed char>::kwpq<float>(2, 3); // no disambiguation here!
}
回答by K-ballo
The typename
keyword, is needed because iterator
is a dependent type on P
. The compiler can't guess if iterator
refers to a value or a type, so it assume its a value unless you yell typename
. It's needed whenever there is a type dependent on a template argument, in a context that either types or values would be valid. For instance, as base classes typename
is not needed since a base class must be a type.
的typename
关键字,需要因为iterator
是上一个依赖型P
。编译器无法猜测iterator
是指一个值还是一个类型,因此它假定它是一个值,除非您大喊typename
. 在类型或值都有效的上下文中,只要存在依赖于模板参数的类型,就需要它。例如,typename
不需要as 基类,因为基类必须是一种类型。
On the same subject, there is a template
keyword used to let the compiler know that some dependent name is a template function instead of a value.
在同一主题上,有一个template
关键字用于让编译器知道某些依赖名称是模板函数而不是值。
回答by sehe
The typename keyword is needed whenever a type name depends on a template parameter, (so the compiler can 'know' the semantics of an identifier (typeor value) without having a full symbol table at the first pass).
每当类型名称依赖于模板参数时,都需要 typename 关键字(因此编译器可以“知道”标识符(类型或值)的语义,而无需在第一次传递完整的符号表)。
Not in the same meaning, and a bit less common, the lone typename keywordcan also be useful when using generic template parameters: http://ideone.com/amImX
含义不同,而且不太常见,lone typename 关键字在使用通用模板参数时也很有用:http: //ideone.com/amImX
#include <string>
#include <list>
#include <vector>
template <template <typename, typename> class Container,
template <typename> class Alloc = std::allocator>
struct ContainerTests
{
typedef Container<int, Alloc<int> > IntContainer;
typedef Container<std::string, Alloc<int> > StringContainer;
//
void DoTests()
{
IntContainer ints;
StringContainer strings;
// ... etc
}
};
int main()
{
ContainerTests<std::vector> t1;
ContainerTests<std::list> t2;
t1.DoTests();
t2.DoTests();
}