macos 如何确定 Mac OS X 上静态库 (.a) 的目标架构?
声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1085137/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
How do I determine the target architecture of static library (.a) on Mac OS X?
提问by Justicle
I'm interested in verifying if a given iPhone static library has been built for ARM or Intel.
我有兴趣验证给定的 iPhone 静态库是否是为 ARM 或 Intel 构建的。
It's more curiosity than anything. Is there some kind of Mac OS X or BSD specific tool to do this? This postgives an example in Linux.
好奇心比什么都强。是否有某种 Mac OS X 或 BSD 特定工具可以执行此操作?这篇文章给出了一个 Linux 中的例子。
回答by Václav Slavík
Another option is lipo
; its output is brief and more readable than otool
's.
另一种选择是lipo
; 它的输出比otool
的更简短且更具可读性。
An example:
一个例子:
% lipo -info /usr/lib/libiodbc.a
Architectures in the fat file: /usr/lib/libiodbc.a are: x86_64 i386 ppc
% lipo -info libnonfatarchive.a
input file libnonfatarchive.a is not a fat file
Non-fat file: libnonfatarchive.a is architecture: i386
%
回答by Logan Capaldo
file
will probably tell you. otool
certainly should be able to. But I'd try file
first,
e.g.
file
大概会告诉你。otool
当然应该可以。但我会file
先尝试,例如
logan:/Users/logan% file d2
d2: Mach-O executable ppc
Example with archive:
存档示例:
logan:/Users/logan% file /usr/lib/libMallocDebug.a
/usr/lib/libMallocDebug.a: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures
/usr/lib/libMallocDebug.a (for architecture i386): current ar archive random library
/usr/lib/libMallocDebug.a (for architecture ppc): current ar archive
回答by Jiahao Chen
As mentioned earlier, file
does not always work. otool -hv -arch all
is probably the closest thing that is guaranteed to work - it gives architecture information for every single object file in the library.
如前所述,file
并不总是有效。otool -hv -arch all
可能是保证工作的最接近的东西 - 它为库中的每个单个对象文件提供体系结构信息。
Example:
例子:
% otool -hv /sw/lib/libfftw3.a Archive : /sw/lib/libfftw3.a /sw/lib/libfftw3.a(align.o): Mach header magic cputype cpusubtype caps filetype ncmds sizeofcmds flags MH_MAGIC_64 X86_64 ALL 0x00 OBJECT 3 336 SUBSECTIONS_VIA_SYMBOLS /sw/lib/libfftw3.a(alloc.o): Mach header magic cputype cpusubtype caps filetype ncmds sizeofcmds flags MH_MAGIC_64 X86_64 ALL 0x00 OBJECT 3 416 SUBSECTIONS_VIA_SYMBOLS ...
回答by Brian Vandenberg
As an alternative, I've found objdump
can work well. As an example, in my environment I build library archives with vxWorks and need to link those into other projects. To test whether the archive is the correct architecture, I could do something like the following (bash syntax):
作为替代方案,我发现objdump
可以很好地工作。例如,在我的环境中,我使用 vxWorks 构建库档案,并需要将它们链接到其他项目中。要测试存档是否是正确的架构,我可以执行以下操作(bash 语法):
if [ "$(objdumpsparc -a ${ARCHIVE_FILE} 2>&1 | ggrep -cvP 'elf32-sparc-vxworks')" -ne "0" ]; then
echo "Cannot build with ${ARCHIVE_FILE}, it contains one or more non-sparc components"
fi;
This example isn't precisely correct, because some lines DO show up that don't say elf32-sparc-vxworks, but it's easy enough to adapt this.
这个例子并不完全正确,因为确实出现了一些没有说 elf32-sparc-vxworks 的行,但是很容易适应这一点。
One nice benefit of this is that objdump
, or a similarly named variant, is installed on most *nix operating systems, whereas tools suggested in other responses aren't.
这样做的一个好处是,objdump
大多数 *nix 操作系统上都安装了 或类似名称的变体,而其他响应中建议的工具则没有。
editIt just occurred to me the OP was asking on OSX. My apologies.
编辑我刚刚想到 OP 在 OSX 上询问。我很抱歉。
回答by bleater
This bash script will help you programmatically get a list of architectures into a variable.
这个 bash 脚本将帮助您以编程方式将架构列表放入一个变量中。
list_archs.sh:
list_archs.sh:
#! /bin/bash
lipo -info | sed -En -e 's/^(Non-|Architectures in the )fat file: .+( is architecture| are): (.*)$//p'
Usage example:
用法示例:
./list_archs.sh /usr/lib/libc.dylib
x86_64 i386