Laravel 4 URL::asset() 和 asset() 的区别
声明：本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要使用它，必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可，注明原文地址和作者信息，同时你必须将它归于原作者（不是我）：StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20559353/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
Laravel 4 difference between URL::asset() and asset()
提问by Javier Cadiz
For loading assets in Laravel 4 projects there is a helperto create a URL for an asset
为了在 Laravel 4 项目中加载资产，有一个帮助程序可以为资产创建 URL
<link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/styles.css') }}" />
But that helper could be called using a facade too
但是也可以使用外观调用该助手
<link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ URL::asset('css/styles.css') }}" />
which produce the same result.
产生相同的结果。
So my question is, which is the real difference here, one way is better in terms of performance than the other or is just a preference style ??
所以我的问题是，这是真正的区别，一种方式在性能方面比另一种方式更好，或者只是一种偏好风格？
回答by Mike Rockétt
This is the asset()function:
这是asset()函数：
if ( ! function_exists('asset'))
{
/**
* Generate an asset path for the application.
*
* @param string $path
* @param bool $secure
* @return string
*/
function asset($path, $secure = null)
{
return app('url')->asset($path, $secure);
}
}
Both of the functions are, therefore, the same. asset()is simply a helper function. Specifically, helpers are more appropriate for views. So, yes, it is a preference thing. I tend to prefer using Facades.
因此，这两个函数是相同的。asset()只是一个辅助函数。具体来说，助手更适合视图。所以，是的，这是一个偏好的东西。我倾向于使用 Facades。
回答by Hao Luo
they are the same. the helper function is just an alias.
他们是一样的。辅助函数只是一个别名。
