Python PEP8 –?import not at the top of file with sys.path
声明:本页面是StackOverFlow热门问题的中英对照翻译,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要使用它,必须同样遵循CC BY-SA许可,注明原文地址和作者信息,同时你必须将它归于原作者(不是我):StackOverFlow
原文地址: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/36827962/
Warning: these are provided under cc-by-sa 4.0 license. You are free to use/share it, But you must attribute it to the original authors (not me):
StackOverFlow
PEP8 –?import not at top of file with sys.path
提问by Luke Taylor
Problem
问题
PEP8 has a rule about putting imports at the top of a file:
PEP8 有一个关于将导入放在文件顶部的规则:
Imports are always put at the top of the file, just after any module comments and docstrings, and before module globals and constants.
导入总是放在文件的顶部,就在任何模块注释和文档字符串之后,以及模块全局变量和常量之前。
However, in certain cases, I might want to do something like:
但是,在某些情况下,我可能想要执行以下操作:
import sys
sys.path.insert("..", 0)
import my_module
In this case, the pep8
command line utility flags my code:
在这种情况下,pep8
命令行实用程序会标记我的代码:
E402 module level import not at top of file
E402 模块级导入不在文件顶部
What is the best way to achieve PEP8 compliance with sys.path
modifications?
通过sys.path
修改实现 PEP8 合规性的最佳方法是什么?
Why
为什么
I have this code because I'm following the project structuregiven in The Hitchhiker's Guide to Python.
我有这个代码是因为我遵循The Hitchhiker's Guide to Python 中给出的项目结构。
That guide suggests that I have a my_module
folder, separate from a tests
folder, both of which are in the same directory. If I want to access my_module
from tests
, I think I need to add ..
to the sys.path
该指南建议我有一个my_module
文件夹,与文件夹分开tests
,两者都在同一目录中。如果我想访问my_module
from tests
,我想我需要添加..
到sys.path
采纳答案by Roland Smith
Often I have multiple files with tests in a subdirectory foo/tests
of my project, while the modules I'm testing are in foo/src
. To run the tests from foo/tests
without import errors I create a file foo/tests/pathmagic.py
that looks like this;
通常,我在foo/tests
项目的子目录中有多个带有测试的文件,而我正在测试的模块在foo/src
. 为了在foo/tests
没有导入错误的情况下运行测试,我创建了一个如下所示的文件foo/tests/pathmagic.py
;
"""Path hack to make tests work."""
import os
import sys
bp = os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath('.')).split(os.sep)
modpath = os.sep.join(bp + ['src'])
sys.path.insert(0, modpath)
In every test file, I then use
在每个测试文件中,我然后使用
import pathmagic # noqa
as the first import. The "noqa" comment prevents pycodestyle
/pep8
from complaining about an unused import.
作为第一个导入。"noqa" 注释可防止pycodestyle
/pep8
抱怨未使用的导入。
回答by astorga
If there are just a few imports, you can just ignore PEP8 on those import
lines:
如果只有几个导入,您可以忽略这些import
行上的 PEP8 :
import sys
sys.path.insert("..", 0)
import my_module # noqa: E402
回答by Peuchele
There is another workaround.
还有另一种解决方法。
import sys
... all your other imports...
sys.path.insert("..", 0)
try:
import my_module
except:
raise
回答by Daniel Lee
Did you already try the following:
您是否已经尝试过以下操作:
import sys
from importlib import import_module
sys.path.insert("..", 0)
# import module
my_mod = import_module('my_module')
# get method or function from my_mod
my_method = getattr(my_mod , 'my_method')
回答by itsadok
I've just struggled with a similar question, and I think I found a slightly nicer solution than the accepted answer.
我刚刚在一个类似的问题上挣扎,我想我找到了一个比接受的答案更好的解决方案。
Create a pathmagic
module that does the actual sys.path manipulation, but make the change within a context manager:
创建一个pathmagic
执行实际 sys.path 操作的模块,但在上下文管理器中进行更改:
"""Path hack to make tests work."""
import os
import sys
class context:
def __enter__(self):
bp = os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath('.')).split(os.sep)
modpath = os.sep.join(bp + ['src'])
sys.path.insert(0, modpath)
def __exit__(self, *args):
pass
Then, in your test files (or wherever you need this), you do:
然后,在您的测试文件(或您需要的任何地方)中,您可以:
import pathmagic
with pathmagic.context():
import my_module
# ...
This way you don't get any complaints from flake8/pycodestyle, you don't need special comments, and the structure seems to make sense.
这样你就不会收到来自 flake8/pycodestyle 的任何抱怨,你不需要特别的注释,而且结构似乎是有道理的。
For extra neatness, consider actually reverting the path in the __exit__
block, though this may cause problems with lazy imports (if you put the module code outside of the context), so maybe not worth the trouble.
为了更加整洁,请考虑实际恢复__exit__
块中的路径,尽管这可能会导致延迟导入出现问题(如果您将模块代码放在上下文之外),因此可能不值得麻烦。
EDIT: Just saw a much simpler trick in an answer to a different question: add assert pathmagic
under your imports to avoid the noqa
comment.
编辑:刚刚在另一个问题的答案中看到了一个更简单的技巧:assert pathmagic
在您的导入下添加以避免noqa
评论。
回答by Pierre Barre
To comply with the pep8, you should include your project path to the python path in order to perform relative / absolute imports.
为了符合 pep8,您应该将项目路径包含到 python 路径中,以便执行相对/绝对导入。
To do so, you can have a look at this answer: Permanently add a directory to PYTHONPATH
为此,您可以查看此答案:将目录永久添加到 PYTHONPATH